ENTRY 11619 20210920 14921161900000001 SUBENT 11619001 20210920 14921161900100001 BIB 11 35 1161900100002 TITLE Differential Cross Sections of the 39,41K(n,n'gamma) 1161900100003 Reaction 1161900100004 AUTHOR (D.B.Nichols,M.T.McEllistrem) 1161900100005 REFERENCE (J,PR,166,1074,1968) 1161900100006 #doi:10.1103/PhysRev.166.1074 1161900100007 INSTITUTE (1USAKTY) 1161900100008 FACILITY (ACCEL,1USAKTY) The University of Kentucky 5.5-MeV 1161900100009 accelerator. 1161900100010 INC-SOURCE (P-T) Neutrons were produced via the T(p,n) 3He 1161900100011 reaction in a 3-cm-long gas cell operated at 1.2 atm. 1161900100012 DETECTOR (NAICR,GELI) The gamma-ray detector was a heavily 1161900100013 shielded anti-Compton or Raboy-Trail spectrometer 1161900100014 consisting of a central NaI(T1) crystal 6 cm in 1161900100015 diameter and 16.5 cm long surrounded by an annular 1161900100016 NaI(T1) crystal with a 21.5 cm outside diameter and 1161900100017 30.5 cm long. Additional data were taken at a neutron 1161900100018 energy of 3.42 MeV with a 6-cc Ge(Li) detector at 90 1161900100019 degrees. 1161900100020 SAMPLE The sample was a 5.8-cm-diam sphere of KOH and was 1161900100021 located 8.7 cm from the gas cell along the beam axis. 1161900100022 MONITOR (26-FE-56(N,INL)26-FE-56,PAR,DA,G) 1161900100023 CORRECTION - Corrections due to geometry: Corrections were 1161900100024 made for three additional geometrical effects. For 1161900100025 each of these the effect was calculated by an 1161900100026 integration over the sample volume. 1161900100027 - The effect of sample absorption of gamma rays and of 1161900100028 incident neutrons was calculated by numerical 1161900100029 integration of neutron and gamma-ray transmission 1161900100030 throughout the sample volume. 1161900100031 HISTORY (19760718T) Translated from SCISRS. 1161900100032 (19830815A) Converted to reaction formalism. 1161900100033 (20210920A) BP: Updated to new date formats, lower 1161900100034 case. Corrections according last EXFOR rules and 1161900100035 Dict. Updated entry, added doi, ERR-ANALYS, SAMPLE, 1161900100036 CORRECTION. Digitized K data. 1161900100037 ENDBIB 35 0 1161900100038 COMMON 1 3 1161900100039 E-NRM 1161900100040 KEV 1161900100041 845. 1161900100042 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161900100043 ENDSUBENT 42 0 1161900199999 SUBENT 11619002 20210920 14921161900200001 BIB 4 8 1161900200002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,SIG) 1161900200003 ANALYSIS (INTAD) Integrated differential cross-section. 1161900200004 Egamma=1.63 denotes the unresolved 41K 1.559-1.696 1161900200005 MeV in the Table II. 1161900200006 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) The rms total standard errors were 1161900200007 tabulated with the cross sections and are near 10%. 1161900200008 STATUS (DEP,11619016) 1161900200009 (TABLE) Table II, page 1077. 1161900200010 ENDBIB 8 0 1161900200011 COMMON 2 3 1161900200012 E-MIN E-MAX 1161900200013 MEV MEV 1161900200014 1.559 1.696 1161900200015 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161900200016 DATA 3 4 1161900200017 EN DATA DATA-ERR 1161900200018 MEV B B 1161900200019 1.82 1.30E-02 1.5E-03 1161900200020 2.63 3.3E-02 3.E-03 1161900200021 3.42 3.5E-02 3.E-03 1161900200022 3.96 4.6E-02 5.E-03 1161900200023 ENDDATA 6 0 1161900200024 ENDSUBENT 23 0 1161900299999 SUBENT 11619003 20210920 14921161900300001 BIB 4 20 1161900300002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,SIG) 1161900300003 ANALYSIS (INTAD) Integrated differential cross-section. 1161900300004 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) The rms total standard errors were 1161900300005 tabulated with the cross sections and are near 10%. 1161900300006 STATUS (DEP,11619007) 1161900300007 (DEP,11619008) 1161900300008 (DEP,11619010) 1161900300009 (DEP,11619013) 1161900300010 (DEP,11619014) 1161900300011 (DEP,11619015) 1161900300012 (DEP,11619017) 1161900300013 (DEP,11619018) 1161900300014 (DEP,11619019) 1161900300015 (DEP,11619020) 1161900300016 (DEP,11619021) 1161900300017 (DEP,11619022) 1161900300018 (DEP,11619023) 1161900300019 (DEP,11619024) 1161900300020 (DEP,11619025) 1161900300021 (TABLE) Table II, page 1077. 1161900300022 ENDBIB 20 0 1161900300023 NOCOMMON 0 0 1161900300024 DATA 4 16 1161900300025 E EN DATA DATA-ERR 1161900300026 MEV MEV B B 1161900300027 .978 1.82 7.E-03 1.E-03 1161900300028 .978 2.63 1.4E-02 1.E-03 1161900300029 .978 3.42 1.6E-02 2.E-03 1161900300030 .978 3.96 1.5E-02 2.E-03 1161900300031 1.266 3.42 3.7E-02 4.E-03 1161900300032 1.266 3.96 7.2E-02 7.E-03 1161900300033 1.291 1.82 5.0E-03 5.E-04 1161900300034 1.291 2.63 1.6E-02 2.E-03 1161900300035 2.519 2.63 1.3E-02 1.E-03 1161900300036 2.519 3.42 5.9E-02 6.E-03 1161900300037 2.519 3.96 1.07E-01 1.0E-02 1161900300038 2.817 3.42 5.6E-02 6.E-03 1161900300039 2.817 3.96 1.25E-01 1.3E-02 1161900300040 3.021 3.42 3.7E-02 4.E-03 1161900300041 3.021 3.96 7.0E-02 7.E-03 1161900300042 3.603 3.96 1.7E-02 2.E-03 1161900300043 ENDDATA 18 0 1161900300044 ENDSUBENT 43 0 1161900399999 SUBENT 11619004 20210920 14921161900400001 BIB 2 5 1161900400002 REACTION (19-K-39(N,P)18-AR-39,PAR,SIG,G) 1161900400003 STATUS (DEP,11619011) 1161900400004 (DEP,11619015) 1161900400005 (DEP,11619021) 1161900400006 (TABLE) Table III, page 1079. 1161900400007 ENDBIB 5 0 1161900400008 COMMON 1 3 1161900400009 E 1161900400010 MEV 1161900400011 1.266 1161900400012 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161900400013 DATA 2 2 1161900400014 EN DATA 1161900400015 MEV MB 1161900400016 3.42 4.0E+01 1161900400017 3.96 7.7E+01 1161900400018 ENDDATA 4 0 1161900400019 ENDSUBENT 18 0 1161900499999 SUBENT 11619005 20210920 14921161900500001 BIB 2 10 1161900500002 REACTION (19-K-39(N,INL)19-K-39,PAR,SIG,G) 1161900500003 STATUS (DEP,11619013) 1161900500004 (DEP,11619017) 1161900500005 (DEP,11619018) 1161900500006 (DEP,11619019) 1161900500007 (DEP,11619022) 1161900500008 (DEP,11619023) 1161900500009 (DEP,11619024) 1161900500010 (DEP,11619025) 1161900500011 (TABLE) Table III, page 1079. 1161900500012 ENDBIB 10 0 1161900500013 NOCOMMON 0 0 1161900500014 DATA 4 8 1161900500015 E EN DATA DATA-APRX 1161900500016 MEV MEV MB MB 1161900500017 2.519 2.63 1.4E+01 1161900500018 2.519 3.42 6.4E+01 1161900500019 2.519 3.96 1.15E+02 1161900500020 2.817 3.42 6.0E+01 1161900500021 2.817 3.96 1.34E+02 1161900500022 3.021 3.42 3.8E+01 1161900500023 3.021 3.96 7.6E+01 1161900500024 3.603 3.96 3.0E+01 1161900500025 ENDDATA 10 0 1161900500026 ENDSUBENT 25 0 1161900599999 SUBENT 11619006 20210920 14921161900600001 BIB 2 7 1161900600002 REACTION (19-K-41(N,INL)19-K-41,PAR,SIG,G) 1161900600003 STATUS (DEP,11619007) 1161900600004 (DEP,11619008) 1161900600005 (DEP,11619010) 1161900600006 (DEP,11619014) 1161900600007 (DEP,11619020) 1161900600008 (TABLE) Table III, page 1079. 1161900600009 ENDBIB 7 0 1161900600010 NOCOMMON 0 0 1161900600011 DATA 3 5 1161900600012 E EN DATA 1161900600013 MEV MEV MB 1161900600014 .978 1.82 8.7E+01 1161900600015 .978 2.63 1.85E+02 1161900600016 .978 3.42 2.06E+02 1161900600017 .978 3.96 1.78E+02 1161900600018 1.291 1.82 7.6E+01 1161900600019 ENDDATA 7 0 1161900600020 ENDSUBENT 19 0 1161900699999 SUBENT 11619007 20210920 14921161900700001 BIB 6 27 1161900700002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,DA,,REL) 1161900700003 REL-REF (M,11591001,D.B.Nichols+,J,PR,151,879,1966) The 1161900700004 pulsed-beam techniques. 1161900700005 METHOD Angular-distribution measurements extended from 40 to 1161900700006 135 degrees with an angular resolution of +-19.6 1161900700007 degrees. The neutron flux was monitored by a 1161900700008 time-gated plastic scintillator located 90 cm from 1161900700009 the source. Rejection of background not correlated in 1161900700010 time with the beam pulses was accomplished by the 1161900700011 pulsed-beam techniques described previously. 1161900700012 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) Relative errors within an angular 1161900700013 distribution were evaluated by combining the 1161900700014 statistical uncertainty of each photopeak area with a 1161900700015 sample position uncertainty of 1 mm. Error bars on 1161900700016 all angular distribution plots indicate these 1161900700017 relative uncertainties which vary from 3 to 14%, and 1161900700018 are typically 5%. Additional uncertainties in the 1161900700019 gamma-ray production cross sections were 1161900700020 (ERR-1) monitor instabilities, 2%; 1161900700021 (ERR-2) absorption corrections, 4%; 1161900700022 (ERR-3) 56Fe normalization cross section, 8%; 1161900700023 (ERR-4,0.,3.) energy dependence of detector efficiency,1161900700024 0 to 3%; 1161900700025 (ERR-5,0.,6.) uncertainty of gamma-ray anisotropy, 1161900700026 0 to 6%. 1161900700027 STATUS (CURVE) Fig. 8, page 1079. 1161900700028 HISTORY (20210920A) BP: Digitized data. 1161900700029 ENDBIB 27 0 1161900700030 COMMON 5 3 1161900700031 EN E ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 1161900700032 MEV KEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT 1161900700033 1.82 978.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 1161900700034 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161900700035 DATA 3 4 1161900700036 COS DATA DATA-ERR 1161900700037 NO-DIM ARB-UNITS ARB-UNITS 1161900700038 -0.716 1.049 0.052 1161900700039 -0.584 0.938 0.066 1161900700040 -0.347 1.030 0.072 1161900700041 -0.010 0.997 0.052 1161900700042 ENDDATA 6 0 1161900700043 ENDSUBENT 42 0 1161900799999 SUBENT 11619008 20210927 14921161900800001 BIB 6 27 1161900800002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,DA,,REL) 1161900800003 REL-REF (M,11591001,D.B.Nichols+,J,PR,151,879,1966) The 1161900800004 pulsed-beam techniques. 1161900800005 METHOD Angular-distribution measurements extended from 40 to 1161900800006 135 degrees with an angular resolution of +-19.6 1161900800007 degrees. The neutron flux was monitored by a 1161900800008 time-gated plastic scintillator located 90 cm from 1161900800009 the source. Rejection of background not correlated in 1161900800010 time with the beam pulses was accomplished by the 1161900800011 pulsed-beam techniques described previously. 1161900800012 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) Relative errors within an angular 1161900800013 distribution were evaluated by combining the 1161900800014 statistical uncertainty of each photopeak area with a 1161900800015 sample position uncertainty of 1 mm. Error bars on 1161900800016 all angular distribution plots indicate these 1161900800017 relative uncertainties which vary from 3 to 14%, and 1161900800018 are typically 5%. Additional uncertainties in the 1161900800019 gamma-ray production cross sections were 1161900800020 (ERR-1) monitor instabilities, 2%; 1161900800021 (ERR-2) absorption corrections, 4%; 1161900800022 (ERR-3) 56Fe normalization cross section, 8%; 1161900800023 (ERR-4,0.,3.) energy dependence of detector efficiency,1161900800024 0 to 3%; 1161900800025 (ERR-5,0.,6.) uncertainty of gamma-ray anisotropy, 1161900800026 0 to 6%. 1161900800027 STATUS (CURVE) Fig. 8, page 1079. 1161900800028 HISTORY (20210920C) BP 1161900800029 ENDBIB 27 0 1161900800030 COMMON 5 3 1161900800031 EN E ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 1161900800032 MEV KEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT 1161900800033 1.82 1291.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 1161900800034 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161900800035 DATA 3 4 1161900800036 COS DATA DATA-ERR 1161900800037 NO-DIM ARB-UNITS ARB-UNITS 1161900800038 -0.718 1.095 0.073 1161900800039 -0.586 1.033 0.087 1161900800040 -0.348 0.969 0.114 1161900800041 -0.005 0.890 0.067 1161900800042 ENDDATA 6 0 1161900800043 ENDSUBENT 42 0 1161900899999 SUBENT 11619009 20210927 14921161900900001 BIB 6 27 1161900900002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,DA,,REL) 1161900900003 REL-REF (M,11591001,D.B.Nichols+,J,PR,151,879,1966) The 1161900900004 pulsed-beam techniques. 1161900900005 METHOD Angular-distribution measurements extended from 40 to 1161900900006 135 degrees with an angular resolution of +-19.6 1161900900007 degrees. The neutron flux was monitored by a 1161900900008 time-gated plastic scintillator located 90 cm from 1161900900009 the source. Rejection of background not correlated in 1161900900010 time with the beam pulses was accomplished by the 1161900900011 pulsed-beam techniques described previously. 1161900900012 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) Relative errors within an angular 1161900900013 distribution were evaluated by combining the 1161900900014 statistical uncertainty of each photopeak area with a 1161900900015 sample position uncertainty of 1 mm. Error bars on 1161900900016 all angular distribution plots indicate these 1161900900017 relative uncertainties which vary from 3 to 14%, and 1161900900018 are typically 5%. Additional uncertainties in the 1161900900019 gamma-ray production cross sections were 1161900900020 (ERR-1) monitor instabilities, 2%; 1161900900021 (ERR-2) absorption corrections, 4%; 1161900900022 (ERR-3) 56Fe normalization cross section, 8%; 1161900900023 (ERR-4,0.,3.) energy dependence of detector efficiency,1161900900024 0 to 3%; 1161900900025 (ERR-5,0.,6.) uncertainty of gamma-ray anisotropy, 1161900900026 0 to 6%. 1161900900027 STATUS (CURVE) Fig. 8, page 1079. 1161900900028 HISTORY (20210920C) BP 1161900900029 ENDBIB 27 0 1161900900030 COMMON 6 3 1161900900031 EN E-MIN E-MAX ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 1161900900032 MEV KEV KEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT 1161900900033 1.82 1580.0 1675.0 2.0 4.0 8.01161900900034 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161900900035 DATA 3 4 1161900900036 COS DATA DATA-ERR 1161900900037 NO-DIM ARB-UNITS ARB-UNITS 1161900900038 -0.714 1.078 0.046 1161900900039 -0.581 0.979 0.053 1161900900040 -0.343 0.860 0.060 1161900900041 -0.007 0.813 0.046 1161900900042 ENDDATA 6 0 1161900900043 ENDSUBENT 42 0 1161900999999 SUBENT 11619010 20210927 14921161901000001 BIB 6 27 1161901000002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,DA,,REL) 1161901000003 REL-REF (M,11591001,D.B.Nichols+,J,PR,151,879,1966) The 1161901000004 pulsed-beam techniques. 1161901000005 METHOD Angular-distribution measurements extended from 40 to 1161901000006 135 degrees with an angular resolution of +-19.6 1161901000007 degrees. The neutron flux was monitored by a 1161901000008 time-gated plastic scintillator located 90 cm from 1161901000009 the source. Rejection of background not correlated in 1161901000010 time with the beam pulses was accomplished by the 1161901000011 pulsed-beam techniques described previously. 1161901000012 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) Relative errors within an angular 1161901000013 distribution were evaluated by combining the 1161901000014 statistical uncertainty of each photopeak area with a 1161901000015 sample position uncertainty of 1 mm. Error bars on 1161901000016 all angular distribution plots indicate these 1161901000017 relative uncertainties which vary from 3 to 14%, and 1161901000018 are typically 5%. Additional uncertainties in the 1161901000019 gamma-ray production cross sections were 1161901000020 (ERR-1) monitor instabilities, 2%; 1161901000021 (ERR-2) absorption corrections, 4%; 1161901000022 (ERR-3) 56Fe normalization cross section, 8%; 1161901000023 (ERR-4,0.,3.) energy dependence of detector efficiency,1161901000024 0 to 3%; 1161901000025 (ERR-5,0.,6.) uncertainty of gamma-ray anisotropy, 1161901000026 0 to 6%. 1161901000027 STATUS (CURVE) Fig. 8, page 1079. 1161901000028 HISTORY (20210920C) BP 1161901000029 ENDBIB 27 0 1161901000030 COMMON 5 3 1161901000031 EN E ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 1161901000032 MEV KEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT 1161901000033 2.63 978.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 1161901000034 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161901000035 DATA 3 7 1161901000036 COS DATA DATA-ERR 1161901000037 NO-DIM ARB-UNITS ARB-UNITS 1161901000038 -0.704 1.015 0.072 1161901000039 -0.572 1.010 0.065 1161901000040 -0.341 0.962 0.059 1161901000041 -0.011 0.993 0.079 1161901000042 0.022 0.941 0.059 1161901000043 0.339 1.051 0.085 1161901000044 0.583 0.951 0.072 1161901000045 ENDDATA 9 0 1161901000046 ENDSUBENT 45 0 1161901099999 SUBENT 11619011 20210927 14921161901100001 BIB 6 27 1161901100002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,DA,,REL) 1161901100003 REL-REF (M,11591001,D.B.Nichols+,J,PR,151,879,1966) The 1161901100004 pulsed-beam techniques. 1161901100005 METHOD Angular-distribution measurements extended from 40 to 1161901100006 135 degrees with an angular resolution of +-19.6 1161901100007 degrees. The neutron flux was monitored by a 1161901100008 time-gated plastic scintillator located 90 cm from 1161901100009 the source. Rejection of background not correlated in 1161901100010 time with the beam pulses was accomplished by the 1161901100011 pulsed-beam techniques described previously. 1161901100012 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) Relative errors within an angular 1161901100013 distribution were evaluated by combining the 1161901100014 statistical uncertainty of each photopeak area with a 1161901100015 sample position uncertainty of 1 mm. Error bars on 1161901100016 all angular distribution plots indicate these 1161901100017 relative uncertainties which vary from 3 to 14%, and 1161901100018 are typically 5%. Additional uncertainties in the 1161901100019 gamma-ray production cross sections were 1161901100020 (ERR-1) monitor instabilities, 2%; 1161901100021 (ERR-2) absorption corrections, 4%; 1161901100022 (ERR-3) 56Fe normalization cross section, 8%; 1161901100023 (ERR-4,0.,3.) energy dependence of detector efficiency,1161901100024 0 to 3%; 1161901100025 (ERR-5,0.,6.) uncertainty of gamma-ray anisotropy, 1161901100026 0 to 6%. 1161901100027 STATUS (CURVE) Fig. 8, page 1079. 1161901100028 HISTORY (20210920C) BP 1161901100029 ENDBIB 27 0 1161901100030 COMMON 6 3 1161901100031 EN E-MIN E-MAX ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 1161901100032 MEV KEV KEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT 1161901100033 2.63 1266.0 1291.0 2.0 4.0 8.01161901100034 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161901100035 DATA 3 8 1161901100036 COS DATA DATA-ERR 1161901100037 NO-DIM ARB-UNITS ARB-UNITS 1161901100038 -0.713 1.035 0.066 1161901100039 -0.581 1.113 0.080 1161901100040 -0.336 0.989 0.073 1161901100041 -0.026 0.957 0.074 1161901100042 0.027 0.910 0.067 1161901100043 0.344 1.018 0.060 1161901100044 0.588 1.047 0.073 1161901100045 0.773 0.997 0.067 1161901100046 ENDDATA 10 0 1161901100047 ENDSUBENT 46 0 1161901199999 SUBENT 11619012 20210927 14921161901200001 BIB 6 27 1161901200002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,DA,,REL) 1161901200003 REL-REF (M,11591001,D.B.Nichols+,J,PR,151,879,1966) The 1161901200004 pulsed-beam techniques. 1161901200005 METHOD Angular-distribution measurements extended from 40 to 1161901200006 135 degrees with an angular resolution of +-19.6 1161901200007 degrees. The neutron flux was monitored by a 1161901200008 time-gated plastic scintillator located 90 cm from 1161901200009 the source. Rejection of background not correlated in 1161901200010 time with the beam pulses was accomplished by the 1161901200011 pulsed-beam techniques described previously. 1161901200012 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) Relative errors within an angular 1161901200013 distribution were evaluated by combining the 1161901200014 statistical uncertainty of each photopeak area with a 1161901200015 sample position uncertainty of 1 mm. Error bars on 1161901200016 all angular distribution plots indicate these 1161901200017 relative uncertainties which vary from 3 to 14%, and 1161901200018 are typically 5%. Additional uncertainties in the 1161901200019 gamma-ray production cross sections were 1161901200020 (ERR-1) monitor instabilities, 2%; 1161901200021 (ERR-2) absorption corrections, 4%; 1161901200022 (ERR-3) 56Fe normalization cross section, 8%; 1161901200023 (ERR-4,0.,3.) energy dependence of detector efficiency,1161901200024 0 to 3%; 1161901200025 (ERR-5,0.,6.) uncertainty of gamma-ray anisotropy, 1161901200026 0 to 6%. 1161901200027 STATUS (CURVE) Fig. 8, page 1079. 1161901200028 HISTORY (20210920C) BP 1161901200029 ENDBIB 27 0 1161901200030 COMMON 6 3 1161901200031 EN E-MIN E-MAX ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 1161901200032 MEV KEV KEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT 1161901200033 2.63 1580.0 1675.0 2.0 4.0 8.01161901200034 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161901200035 DATA 3 8 1161901200036 COS DATA DATA-ERR 1161901200037 NO-DIM ARB-UNITS ARB-UNITS 1161901200038 -0.708 1.049 0.039 1161901200039 -0.576 1.082 0.052 1161901200040 -0.338 0.984 0.052 1161901200041 -0.021 0.931 0.046 1161901200042 0.025 0.918 0.059 1161901200043 0.342 0.970 0.052 1161901200044 0.580 0.892 0.052 1161901200045 0.771 1.016 0.066 1161901200046 ENDDATA 10 0 1161901200047 ENDSUBENT 46 0 1161901299999 SUBENT 11619013 20210927 14921161901300001 BIB 6 27 1161901300002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,DA,,REL) 1161901300003 REL-REF (M,11591001,D.B.Nichols+,J,PR,151,879,1966) The 1161901300004 pulsed-beam techniques. 1161901300005 METHOD Angular-distribution measurements extended from 40 to 1161901300006 135 degrees with an angular resolution of +-19.6 1161901300007 degrees. The neutron flux was monitored by a 1161901300008 time-gated plastic scintillator located 90 cm from 1161901300009 the source. Rejection of background not correlated in 1161901300010 time with the beam pulses was accomplished by the 1161901300011 pulsed-beam techniques described previously. 1161901300012 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) Relative errors within an angular 1161901300013 distribution were evaluated by combining the 1161901300014 statistical uncertainty of each photopeak area with a 1161901300015 sample position uncertainty of 1 mm. Error bars on 1161901300016 all angular distribution plots indicate these 1161901300017 relative uncertainties which vary from 3 to 14%, and 1161901300018 are typically 5%. Additional uncertainties in the 1161901300019 gamma-ray production cross sections were 1161901300020 (ERR-1) monitor instabilities, 2%; 1161901300021 (ERR-2) absorption corrections, 4%; 1161901300022 (ERR-3) 56Fe normalization cross section, 8%; 1161901300023 (ERR-4,0.,3.) energy dependence of detector efficiency,1161901300024 0 to 3%; 1161901300025 (ERR-5,0.,6.) uncertainty of gamma-ray anisotropy, 1161901300026 0 to 6%. 1161901300027 STATUS (CURVE) Fig. 8, page 1079. 1161901300028 HISTORY (20210920C) BP 1161901300029 ENDBIB 27 0 1161901300030 COMMON 5 3 1161901300031 EN E ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 1161901300032 MEV KEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT 1161901300033 2.63 2519.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 1161901300034 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161901300035 DATA 3 8 1161901300036 COS DATA DATA-ERR 1161901300037 NO-DIM ARB-UNITS ARB-UNITS 1161901300038 -0.710 0.943 0.072 1161901300039 -0.578 0.951 0.066 1161901300040 -0.347 1.001 0.078 1161901300041 -0.017 0.974 0.072 1161901300042 0.023 1.040 0.085 1161901300043 0.340 1.006 0.065 1161901300044 0.577 1.003 0.072 1161901300045 0.769 0.954 0.092 1161901300046 ENDDATA 10 0 1161901300047 ENDSUBENT 46 0 1161901399999 SUBENT 11619014 20210927 14921161901400001 BIB 6 27 1161901400002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,DA,,REL) 1161901400003 REL-REF (M,11591001,D.B.Nichols+,J,PR,151,879,1966) The 1161901400004 pulsed-beam techniques. 1161901400005 METHOD Angular-distribution measurements extended from 40 to 1161901400006 135 degrees with an angular resolution of +-19.6 1161901400007 degrees. The neutron flux was monitored by a 1161901400008 time-gated plastic scintillator located 90 cm from 1161901400009 the source. Rejection of background not correlated in 1161901400010 time with the beam pulses was accomplished by the 1161901400011 pulsed-beam techniques described previously. 1161901400012 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) Relative errors within an angular 1161901400013 distribution were evaluated by combining the 1161901400014 statistical uncertainty of each photopeak area with a 1161901400015 sample position uncertainty of 1 mm. Error bars on 1161901400016 all angular distribution plots indicate these 1161901400017 relative uncertainties which vary from 3 to 14%, and 1161901400018 are typically 5%. Additional uncertainties in the 1161901400019 gamma-ray production cross sections were 1161901400020 (ERR-1) monitor instabilities, 2%; 1161901400021 (ERR-2) absorption corrections, 4%; 1161901400022 (ERR-3) 56Fe normalization cross section, 8%; 1161901400023 (ERR-4,0.,3.) energy dependence of detector efficiency,1161901400024 0 to 3%; 1161901400025 (ERR-5,0.,6.) uncertainty of gamma-ray anisotropy, 1161901400026 0 to 6%. 1161901400027 STATUS (CURVE) Fig. 9, page 1079. 1161901400028 HISTORY (20210920C) BP 1161901400029 ENDBIB 27 0 1161901400030 COMMON 5 3 1161901400031 EN E ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 1161901400032 MEV KEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT 1161901400033 3.42 978.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 1161901400034 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161901400035 DATA 3 5 1161901400036 COS DATA DATA-ERR 1161901400037 NO-DIM ARB-UNITS ARB-UNITS 1161901400038 -0.714 0.943 0.063 1161901400039 -0.573 1.029 0.073 1161901400040 -0.337 0.984 0.057 1161901400041 -0.020 1.047 0.073 1161901400042 0.025 1.073 0.073 1161901400043 ENDDATA 7 0 1161901400044 ENDSUBENT 43 0 1161901499999 SUBENT 11619015 20210927 14921161901500001 BIB 6 27 1161901500002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,DA,,REL) 1161901500003 REL-REF (M,11591001,D.B.Nichols+,J,PR,151,879,1966) The 1161901500004 pulsed-beam techniques. 1161901500005 METHOD Angular-distribution measurements extended from 40 to 1161901500006 135 degrees with an angular resolution of +-19.6 1161901500007 degrees. The neutron flux was monitored by a 1161901500008 time-gated plastic scintillator located 90 cm from 1161901500009 the source. Rejection of background not correlated in 1161901500010 time with the beam pulses was accomplished by the 1161901500011 pulsed-beam techniques described previously. 1161901500012 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) Relative errors within an angular 1161901500013 distribution were evaluated by combining the 1161901500014 statistical uncertainty of each photopeak area with a 1161901500015 sample position uncertainty of 1 mm. Error bars on 1161901500016 all angular distribution plots indicate these 1161901500017 relative uncertainties which vary from 3 to 14%, and 1161901500018 are typically 5%. Additional uncertainties in the 1161901500019 gamma-ray production cross sections were 1161901500020 (ERR-1) monitor instabilities, 2%; 1161901500021 (ERR-2) absorption corrections, 4%; 1161901500022 (ERR-3) 56Fe normalization cross section, 8%; 1161901500023 (ERR-4,0.,3.) energy dependence of detector efficiency,1161901500024 0 to 3%; 1161901500025 (ERR-5,0.,6.) uncertainty of gamma-ray anisotropy, 1161901500026 0 to 6%. 1161901500027 STATUS (CURVE) Fig. 9, page 1079. 1161901500028 HISTORY (20210920C) BP 1161901500029 ENDBIB 27 0 1161901500030 COMMON 5 3 1161901500031 EN E ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 1161901500032 MEV KEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT 1161901500033 3.42 1266.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 1161901500034 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161901500035 DATA 3 8 1161901500036 COS DATA DATA-ERR 1161901500037 NO-DIM ARB-UNITS ARB-UNITS 1161901500038 -0.707 0.966 0.032 1161901500039 -0.571 1.080 0.042 1161901500040 -0.335 0.997 0.042 1161901500041 -0.014 0.993 0.036 1161901500042 0.032 1.119 0.047 1161901500043 0.343 0.983 0.053 1161901500044 0.584 1.058 0.052 1161901500045 0.780 0.950 0.047 1161901500046 ENDDATA 10 0 1161901500047 ENDSUBENT 46 0 1161901599999 SUBENT 11619016 20210927 14921161901600001 BIB 6 27 1161901600002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,DA,,REL) 1161901600003 REL-REF (M,11591001,D.B.Nichols+,J,PR,151,879,1966) The 1161901600004 pulsed-beam techniques. 1161901600005 METHOD Angular-distribution measurements extended from 40 to 1161901600006 135 degrees with an angular resolution of +-19.6 1161901600007 degrees. The neutron flux was monitored by a 1161901600008 time-gated plastic scintillator located 90 cm from 1161901600009 the source. Rejection of background not correlated in 1161901600010 time with the beam pulses was accomplished by the 1161901600011 pulsed-beam techniques described previously. 1161901600012 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) Relative errors within an angular 1161901600013 distribution were evaluated by combining the 1161901600014 statistical uncertainty of each photopeak area with a 1161901600015 sample position uncertainty of 1 mm. Error bars on 1161901600016 all angular distribution plots indicate these 1161901600017 relative uncertainties which vary from 3 to 14%, and 1161901600018 are typically 5%. Additional uncertainties in the 1161901600019 gamma-ray production cross sections were 1161901600020 (ERR-1) monitor instabilities, 2%; 1161901600021 (ERR-2) absorption corrections, 4%; 1161901600022 (ERR-3) 56Fe normalization cross section, 8%; 1161901600023 (ERR-4,0.,3.) energy dependence of detector efficiency,1161901600024 0 to 3%; 1161901600025 (ERR-5,0.,6.) uncertainty of gamma-ray anisotropy, 1161901600026 0 to 6%. 1161901600027 STATUS (CURVE) Fig. 9, page 1079. 1161901600028 HISTORY (20210920C) BP 1161901600029 ENDBIB 27 0 1161901600030 COMMON 6 3 1161901600031 EN E-MIN E-MAX ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 1161901600032 MEV KEV KEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT 1161901600033 3.42 1559.0 1675.0 2.0 4.0 8.01161901600034 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161901600035 DATA 3 8 1161901600036 COS DATA DATA-ERR 1161901600037 NO-DIM ARB-UNITS ARB-UNITS 1161901600038 -0.701 1.015 0.056 1161901600039 -0.570 1.113 0.056 1161901600040 -0.334 1.026 0.046 1161901600041 -0.012 1.031 0.051 1161901600042 0.023 0.969 0.051 1161901600043 0.345 0.995 0.046 1161901600044 0.586 0.928 0.062 1161901600045 0.776 0.872 0.082 1161901600046 ENDDATA 10 0 1161901600047 ENDSUBENT 46 0 1161901699999 SUBENT 11619017 20210927 14921161901700001 BIB 6 27 1161901700002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,DA,,REL) 1161901700003 REL-REF (M,11591001,D.B.Nichols+,J,PR,151,879,1966) The 1161901700004 pulsed-beam techniques. 1161901700005 METHOD Angular-distribution measurements extended from 40 to 1161901700006 135 degrees with an angular resolution of +-19.6 1161901700007 degrees. The neutron flux was monitored by a 1161901700008 time-gated plastic scintillator located 90 cm from 1161901700009 the source. Rejection of background not correlated in 1161901700010 time with the beam pulses was accomplished by the 1161901700011 pulsed-beam techniques described previously. 1161901700012 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) Relative errors within an angular 1161901700013 distribution were evaluated by combining the 1161901700014 statistical uncertainty of each photopeak area with a 1161901700015 sample position uncertainty of 1 mm. Error bars on 1161901700016 all angular distribution plots indicate these 1161901700017 relative uncertainties which vary from 3 to 14%, and 1161901700018 are typically 5%. Additional uncertainties in the 1161901700019 gamma-ray production cross sections were 1161901700020 (ERR-1) monitor instabilities, 2%; 1161901700021 (ERR-2) absorption corrections, 4%; 1161901700022 (ERR-3) 56Fe normalization cross section, 8%; 1161901700023 (ERR-4,0.,3.) energy dependence of detector efficiency,1161901700024 0 to 3%; 1161901700025 (ERR-5,0.,6.) uncertainty of gamma-ray anisotropy, 1161901700026 0 to 6%. 1161901700027 STATUS (CURVE) Fig. 9, page 1079. 1161901700028 HISTORY (20210920C) BP 1161901700029 ENDBIB 27 0 1161901700030 COMMON 5 3 1161901700031 EN E ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 1161901700032 MEV KEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT 1161901700033 3.42 2519.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 1161901700034 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161901700035 DATA 3 8 1161901700036 COS DATA DATA-ERR 1161901700037 NO-DIM ARB-UNITS ARB-UNITS 1161901700038 -0.708 0.932 0.035 1161901700039 -0.578 1.073 0.046 1161901700040 -0.341 0.916 0.051 1161901700041 -0.020 1.033 0.041 1161901700042 0.020 1.058 0.041 1161901700043 0.342 1.018 0.056 1161901700044 0.578 1.018 0.056 1161901700045 0.774 1.033 0.046 1161901700046 ENDDATA 10 0 1161901700047 ENDSUBENT 46 0 1161901799999 SUBENT 11619018 20210927 14921161901800001 BIB 6 27 1161901800002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,DA,,REL) 1161901800003 REL-REF (M,11591001,D.B.Nichols+,J,PR,151,879,1966) The 1161901800004 pulsed-beam techniques. 1161901800005 METHOD Angular-distribution measurements extended from 40 to 1161901800006 135 degrees with an angular resolution of +-19.6 1161901800007 degrees. The neutron flux was monitored by a 1161901800008 time-gated plastic scintillator located 90 cm from 1161901800009 the source. Rejection of background not correlated in 1161901800010 time with the beam pulses was accomplished by the 1161901800011 pulsed-beam techniques described previously. 1161901800012 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) Relative errors within an angular 1161901800013 distribution were evaluated by combining the 1161901800014 statistical uncertainty of each photopeak area with a 1161901800015 sample position uncertainty of 1 mm. Error bars on 1161901800016 all angular distribution plots indicate these 1161901800017 relative uncertainties which vary from 3 to 14%, and 1161901800018 are typically 5%. Additional uncertainties in the 1161901800019 gamma-ray production cross sections were 1161901800020 (ERR-1) monitor instabilities, 2%; 1161901800021 (ERR-2) absorption corrections, 4%; 1161901800022 (ERR-3) 56Fe normalization cross section, 8%; 1161901800023 (ERR-4,0.,3.) energy dependence of detector efficiency,1161901800024 0 to 3%; 1161901800025 (ERR-5,0.,6.) uncertainty of gamma-ray anisotropy, 1161901800026 0 to 6%. 1161901800027 STATUS (CURVE) Fig. 9, page 1079. 1161901800028 HISTORY (20210920C) BP 1161901800029 ENDBIB 27 0 1161901800030 COMMON 5 3 1161901800031 EN E ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 1161901800032 MEV KEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT 1161901800033 3.42 2817.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 1161901800034 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161901800035 DATA 3 8 1161901800036 COS DATA DATA-ERR 1161901800037 NO-DIM ARB-UNITS ARB-UNITS 1161901800038 -0.710 1.021 0.051 1161901800039 -0.584 0.982 0.035 1161901800040 -0.343 0.889 0.030 1161901800041 -0.031 0.822 0.040 1161901800042 0.029 0.833 0.040 1161901800043 0.341 0.883 0.030 1161901800044 0.581 0.987 0.036 1161901800045 0.772 1.182 0.035 1161901800046 ENDDATA 10 0 1161901800047 ENDSUBENT 46 0 1161901899999 SUBENT 11619019 20210927 14921161901900001 BIB 6 27 1161901900002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,DA,,REL) 1161901900003 REL-REF (M,11591001,D.B.Nichols+,J,PR,151,879,1966) The 1161901900004 pulsed-beam techniques. 1161901900005 METHOD Angular-distribution measurements extended from 40 to 1161901900006 135 degrees with an angular resolution of +-19.6 1161901900007 degrees. The neutron flux was monitored by a 1161901900008 time-gated plastic scintillator located 90 cm from 1161901900009 the source. Rejection of background not correlated in 1161901900010 time with the beam pulses was accomplished by the 1161901900011 pulsed-beam techniques described previously. 1161901900012 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) Relative errors within an angular 1161901900013 distribution were evaluated by combining the 1161901900014 statistical uncertainty of each photopeak area with a 1161901900015 sample position uncertainty of 1 mm. Error bars on 1161901900016 all angular distribution plots indicate these 1161901900017 relative uncertainties which vary from 3 to 14%, and 1161901900018 are typically 5%. Additional uncertainties in the 1161901900019 gamma-ray production cross sections were 1161901900020 (ERR-1) monitor instabilities, 2%; 1161901900021 (ERR-2) absorption corrections, 4%; 1161901900022 (ERR-3) 56Fe normalization cross section, 8%; 1161901900023 (ERR-4,0.,3.) energy dependence of detector efficiency,1161901900024 0 to 3%; 1161901900025 (ERR-5,0.,6.) uncertainty of gamma-ray anisotropy, 1161901900026 0 to 6%. 1161901900027 STATUS (CURVE) Fig. 9, page 1079. 1161901900028 HISTORY (20210920C) BP 1161901900029 ENDBIB 27 0 1161901900030 COMMON 5 3 1161901900031 EN E ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 1161901900032 MEV KEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT 1161901900033 3.42 3021.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 1161901900034 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161901900035 DATA 3 8 1161901900036 COS DATA DATA-ERR 1161901900037 NO-DIM ARB-UNITS ARB-UNITS 1161901900038 -0.712 1.036 0.056 1161901900039 -0.586 0.974 0.056 1161901900040 -0.345 0.969 0.051 1161901900041 -0.019 1.031 0.046 1161901900042 0.022 1.021 0.056 1161901900043 0.338 1.000 0.056 1161901900044 0.579 1.056 0.056 1161901900045 0.770 1.000 0.051 1161901900046 ENDDATA 10 0 1161901900047 ENDSUBENT 46 0 1161901999999 SUBENT 11619020 20210927 14921161902000001 BIB 6 27 1161902000002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,DA,,REL) 1161902000003 REL-REF (M,11591001,D.B.Nichols+,J,PR,151,879,1966) The 1161902000004 pulsed-beam techniques. 1161902000005 METHOD Angular-distribution measurements extended from 40 to 1161902000006 135 degrees with an angular resolution of +-19.6 1161902000007 degrees. The neutron flux was monitored by a 1161902000008 time-gated plastic scintillator located 90 cm from 1161902000009 the source. Rejection of background not correlated in 1161902000010 time with the beam pulses was accomplished by the 1161902000011 pulsed-beam techniques described previously. 1161902000012 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) Relative errors within an angular 1161902000013 distribution were evaluated by combining the 1161902000014 statistical uncertainty of each photopeak area with a 1161902000015 sample position uncertainty of 1 mm. Error bars on 1161902000016 all angular distribution plots indicate these 1161902000017 relative uncertainties which vary from 3 to 14%, and 1161902000018 are typically 5%. Additional uncertainties in the 1161902000019 gamma-ray production cross sections were 1161902000020 (ERR-1) monitor instabilities, 2%; 1161902000021 (ERR-2) absorption corrections, 4%; 1161902000022 (ERR-3) 56Fe normalization cross section, 8%; 1161902000023 (ERR-4,0.,3.) energy dependence of detector efficiency,1161902000024 0 to 3%; 1161902000025 (ERR-5,0.,6.) uncertainty of gamma-ray anisotropy, 1161902000026 0 to 6%. 1161902000027 STATUS (CURVE) Fig. 10, page 1080. 1161902000028 HISTORY (20210920C) BP 1161902000029 ENDBIB 27 0 1161902000030 COMMON 5 3 1161902000031 EN E ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 1161902000032 MEV KEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT 1161902000033 3.96 978.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 1161902000034 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161902000035 DATA 3 5 1161902000036 COS DATA DATA-ERR 1161902000037 NO-DIM ARB-UNITS ARB-UNITS 1161902000038 -0.712 1.010 0.078 1161902000039 -0.585 1.000 0.073 1161902000040 -0.341 1.073 0.078 1161902000041 -0.020 1.034 0.078 1161902000042 0.024 0.912 0.068 1161902000043 ENDDATA 7 0 1161902000044 ENDSUBENT 43 0 1161902099999 SUBENT 11619021 20210927 14921161902100001 BIB 6 27 1161902100002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,DA,,REL) 1161902100003 REL-REF (M,11591001,D.B.Nichols+,J,PR,151,879,1966) The 1161902100004 pulsed-beam techniques. 1161902100005 METHOD Angular-distribution measurements extended from 40 to 1161902100006 135 degrees with an angular resolution of +-19.6 1161902100007 degrees. The neutron flux was monitored by a 1161902100008 time-gated plastic scintillator located 90 cm from 1161902100009 the source. Rejection of background not correlated in 1161902100010 time with the beam pulses was accomplished by the 1161902100011 pulsed-beam techniques described previously. 1161902100012 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) Relative errors within an angular 1161902100013 distribution were evaluated by combining the 1161902100014 statistical uncertainty of each photopeak area with a 1161902100015 sample position uncertainty of 1 mm. Error bars on 1161902100016 all angular distribution plots indicate these 1161902100017 relative uncertainties which vary from 3 to 14%, and 1161902100018 are typically 5%. Additional uncertainties in the 1161902100019 gamma-ray production cross sections were 1161902100020 (ERR-1) monitor instabilities, 2%; 1161902100021 (ERR-2) absorption corrections, 4%; 1161902100022 (ERR-3) 56Fe normalization cross section, 8%; 1161902100023 (ERR-4,0.,3.) energy dependence of detector efficiency,1161902100024 0 to 3%; 1161902100025 (ERR-5,0.,6.) uncertainty of gamma-ray anisotropy, 1161902100026 0 to 6%. 1161902100027 STATUS (CURVE) Fig. 10, page 1080. 1161902100028 HISTORY (20210920C) BP 1161902100029 ENDBIB 27 0 1161902100030 COMMON 5 3 1161902100031 EN E ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 1161902100032 MEV KEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT 1161902100033 3.96 1266.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 1161902100034 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161902100035 DATA 3 7 1161902100036 COS DATA DATA-ERR 1161902100037 NO-DIM ARB-UNITS ARB-UNITS 1161902100038 -0.712 1.024 0.033 1161902100039 -0.580 1.029 0.029 1161902100040 -0.337 1.014 0.043 1161902100041 -0.010 1.024 0.029 1161902100042 0.024 0.967 0.038 1161902100043 0.341 1.005 0.038 1161902100044 0.585 0.976 0.038 1161902100045 ENDDATA 9 0 1161902100046 ENDSUBENT 45 0 1161902199999 SUBENT 11619022 20210927 14921161902200001 BIB 6 27 1161902200002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,DA,,REL) 1161902200003 REL-REF (M,11591001,D.B.Nichols+,J,PR,151,879,1966) The 1161902200004 pulsed-beam techniques. 1161902200005 METHOD Angular-distribution measurements extended from 40 to 1161902200006 135 degrees with an angular resolution of +-19.6 1161902200007 degrees. The neutron flux was monitored by a 1161902200008 time-gated plastic scintillator located 90 cm from 1161902200009 the source. Rejection of background not correlated in 1161902200010 time with the beam pulses was accomplished by the 1161902200011 pulsed-beam techniques described previously. 1161902200012 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) Relative errors within an angular 1161902200013 distribution were evaluated by combining the 1161902200014 statistical uncertainty of each photopeak area with a 1161902200015 sample position uncertainty of 1 mm. Error bars on 1161902200016 all angular distribution plots indicate these 1161902200017 relative uncertainties which vary from 3 to 14%, and 1161902200018 are typically 5%. Additional uncertainties in the 1161902200019 gamma-ray production cross sections were 1161902200020 (ERR-1) monitor instabilities, 2%; 1161902200021 (ERR-2) absorption corrections, 4%; 1161902200022 (ERR-3) 56Fe normalization cross section, 8%; 1161902200023 (ERR-4,0.,3.) energy dependence of detector efficiency,1161902200024 0 to 3%; 1161902200025 (ERR-5,0.,6.) uncertainty of gamma-ray anisotropy, 1161902200026 0 to 6%. 1161902200027 STATUS (CURVE) Fig. 10, page 1080. 1161902200028 HISTORY (20210920C) BP 1161902200029 ENDBIB 27 0 1161902200030 COMMON 5 3 1161902200031 EN E ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 1161902200032 MEV KEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT 1161902200033 3.96 2519.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 1161902200034 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161902200035 DATA 3 8 1161902200036 COS DATA DATA-ERR 1161902200037 NO-DIM ARB-UNITS ARB-UNITS 1161902200038 -0.707 1.002 0.034 1161902200039 -0.580 1.012 0.048 1161902200040 -0.337 0.998 0.034 1161902200041 -0.020 1.031 0.039 1161902200042 0.029 1.012 0.034 1161902200043 0.351 1.012 0.043 1161902200044 0.590 0.983 0.048 1161902200045 0.776 0.993 0.048 1161902200046 ENDDATA 10 0 1161902200047 ENDSUBENT 46 0 1161902299999 SUBENT 11619023 20210927 14921161902300001 BIB 6 27 1161902300002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,DA,,REL) 1161902300003 REL-REF (M,11591001,D.B.Nichols+,J,PR,151,879,1966) The 1161902300004 pulsed-beam techniques. 1161902300005 METHOD Angular-distribution measurements extended from 40 to 1161902300006 135 degrees with an angular resolution of +-19.6 1161902300007 degrees. The neutron flux was monitored by a 1161902300008 time-gated plastic scintillator located 90 cm from 1161902300009 the source. Rejection of background not correlated in 1161902300010 time with the beam pulses was accomplished by the 1161902300011 pulsed-beam techniques described previously. 1161902300012 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) Relative errors within an angular 1161902300013 distribution were evaluated by combining the 1161902300014 statistical uncertainty of each photopeak area with a 1161902300015 sample position uncertainty of 1 mm. Error bars on 1161902300016 all angular distribution plots indicate these 1161902300017 relative uncertainties which vary from 3 to 14%, and 1161902300018 are typically 5%. Additional uncertainties in the 1161902300019 gamma-ray production cross sections were 1161902300020 (ERR-1) monitor instabilities, 2%; 1161902300021 (ERR-2) absorption corrections, 4%; 1161902300022 (ERR-3) 56Fe normalization cross section, 8%; 1161902300023 (ERR-4,0.,3.) energy dependence of detector efficiency,1161902300024 0 to 3%; 1161902300025 (ERR-5,0.,6.) uncertainty of gamma-ray anisotropy, 1161902300026 0 to 6%. 1161902300027 STATUS (CURVE) Fig. 10, page 1080. 1161902300028 HISTORY (20210920C) BP 1161902300029 ENDBIB 27 0 1161902300030 COMMON 5 3 1161902300031 EN E ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 1161902300032 MEV KEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT 1161902300033 3.96 2817.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 1161902300034 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161902300035 DATA 3 8 1161902300036 COS DATA DATA-ERR 1161902300037 NO-DIM ARB-UNITS ARB-UNITS 1161902300038 -0.712 1.157 0.043 1161902300039 -0.580 1.080 0.039 1161902300040 -0.341 0.930 0.034 1161902300041 -0.020 0.877 0.034 1161902300042 0.024 0.858 0.043 1161902300043 0.346 0.877 0.029 1161902300044 0.585 0.940 0.039 1161902300045 0.780 1.051 0.039 1161902300046 ENDDATA 10 0 1161902300047 ENDSUBENT 46 0 1161902399999 SUBENT 11619024 20210927 14921161902400001 BIB 6 27 1161902400002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,DA,,REL) 1161902400003 REL-REF (M,11591001,D.B.Nichols+,J,PR,151,879,1966) The 1161902400004 pulsed-beam techniques. 1161902400005 METHOD Angular-distribution measurements extended from 40 to 1161902400006 135 degrees with an angular resolution of +-19.6 1161902400007 degrees. The neutron flux was monitored by a 1161902400008 time-gated plastic scintillator located 90 cm from 1161902400009 the source. Rejection of background not correlated in 1161902400010 time with the beam pulses was accomplished by the 1161902400011 pulsed-beam techniques described previously. 1161902400012 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) Relative errors within an angular 1161902400013 distribution were evaluated by combining the 1161902400014 statistical uncertainty of each photopeak area with a 1161902400015 sample position uncertainty of 1 mm. Error bars on 1161902400016 all angular distribution plots indicate these 1161902400017 relative uncertainties which vary from 3 to 14%, and 1161902400018 are typically 5%. Additional uncertainties in the 1161902400019 gamma-ray production cross sections were 1161902400020 (ERR-1) monitor instabilities, 2%; 1161902400021 (ERR-2) absorption corrections, 4%; 1161902400022 (ERR-3) 56Fe normalization cross section, 8%; 1161902400023 (ERR-4,0.,3.) energy dependence of detector efficiency,1161902400024 0 to 3%; 1161902400025 (ERR-5,0.,6.) uncertainty of gamma-ray anisotropy, 1161902400026 0 to 6%. 1161902400027 STATUS (CURVE) Fig. 10, page 1080. 1161902400028 HISTORY (20210920C) BP 1161902400029 ENDBIB 27 0 1161902400030 COMMON 5 3 1161902400031 EN E ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 1161902400032 MEV KEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT 1161902400033 3.96 3021.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 1161902400034 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161902400035 DATA 3 8 1161902400036 COS DATA DATA-ERR 1161902400037 NO-DIM ARB-UNITS ARB-UNITS 1161902400038 -0.717 1.031 0.058 1161902400039 -0.580 1.012 0.058 1161902400040 -0.341 1.041 0.048 1161902400041 -0.020 1.089 0.058 1161902400042 0.024 1.036 0.058 1161902400043 0.346 1.007 0.058 1161902400044 0.590 0.983 0.048 1161902400045 0.780 0.925 0.048 1161902400046 ENDDATA 10 0 1161902400047 ENDSUBENT 46 0 1161902499999 SUBENT 11619025 20210927 14921161902500001 BIB 6 27 1161902500002 REACTION (19-K-0(N,X)0-G-0,PAR,DA,,REL) 1161902500003 REL-REF (M,11591001,D.B.Nichols+,J,PR,151,879,1966) The 1161902500004 pulsed-beam techniques. 1161902500005 METHOD Angular-distribution measurements extended from 40 to 1161902500006 135 degrees with an angular resolution of +-19.6 1161902500007 degrees. The neutron flux was monitored by a 1161902500008 time-gated plastic scintillator located 90 cm from 1161902500009 the source. Rejection of background not correlated in 1161902500010 time with the beam pulses was accomplished by the 1161902500011 pulsed-beam techniques described previously. 1161902500012 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR) Relative errors within an angular 1161902500013 distribution were evaluated by combining the 1161902500014 statistical uncertainty of each photopeak area with a 1161902500015 sample position uncertainty of 1 mm. Error bars on 1161902500016 all angular distribution plots indicate these 1161902500017 relative uncertainties which vary from 3 to 14%, and 1161902500018 are typically 5%. Additional uncertainties in the 1161902500019 gamma-ray production cross sections were 1161902500020 (ERR-1) monitor instabilities, 2%; 1161902500021 (ERR-2) absorption corrections, 4%; 1161902500022 (ERR-3) 56Fe normalization cross section, 8%; 1161902500023 (ERR-4,0.,3.) energy dependence of detector efficiency,1161902500024 0 to 3%; 1161902500025 (ERR-5,0.,6.) uncertainty of gamma-ray anisotropy, 1161902500026 0 to 6%. 1161902500027 STATUS (CURVE) Fig. 10, page 1080. 1161902500028 HISTORY (20210920C) BP 1161902500029 ENDBIB 27 0 1161902500030 COMMON 5 3 1161902500031 EN E ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 1161902500032 MEV KEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT 1161902500033 3.96 3603.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 1161902500034 ENDCOMMON 3 0 1161902500035 DATA 3 8 1161902500036 COS DATA DATA-ERR 1161902500037 NO-DIM ARB-UNITS ARB-UNITS 1161902500038 -0.717 1.166 0.102 1161902500039 -0.585 0.942 0.107 1161902500040 -0.341 0.756 0.121 1161902500041 -0.024 0.726 0.107 1161902500042 0.020 0.725 0.102 1161902500043 0.346 0.836 0.126 1161902500044 0.585 0.952 0.146 1161902500045 0.776 1.169 0.185 1161902500046 ENDDATA 10 0 1161902500047 ENDSUBENT 46 0 1161902599999 ENDENTRY 25 0 1161999999999