ENTRY B0102 20110607 B023B010200000001 SUBENT B0102001 20110607 B023B010200100001 BIB 6 13 B010200100002 TITLE Production of tritium and isotopes of rare gases in B010200100003 irradiations of Fe and Cu with protons of 25 GeV. B010200100004 AUTHOR (K.Goebel, J.Zaehringer) B010200100005 INSTITUTE (2ZZZCER) B010200100006 REFERENCE (J,ZN/A,16,231,1961) B010200100007 FACILITY (SYNCH,2ZZZCER) B010200100008 HISTORY (19781010C)lapf B010200100009 (19940712A) some corrections have been included by B010200100010 CAJAD B010200100011 (19980916A) lower case and some little corrections. B010200100012 (20100823A) B010200100013 (20100823A).Renormalized data has been reported in B010200100014 D0628 B010200100015 ENDBIB 13 0 B010200100016 COMMON 1 3 B010200100017 EN B010200100018 GEV B010200100019 25. B010200100020 ENDCOMMON 3 0 B010200100021 ENDSUBENT 20 0 B010200199999 SUBENT B0102002 20110607 B023B010200200001 BIB 13 48 B010200200002 REACTION (13-AL-27(P,X)1-H-3,,SIG) B010200200003 HISTORY (20100823A).Data were renormalized and reported in B010200200004 D0628005 (R,CERN-64-12,1964) B010200200005 RAD-DET (1-H-3,B-) B010200200006 DECAY-DATA (1-H-3,,B-) B010200200007 METHOD (INTB,SITA,MOSEP) B010200200008 Due to the high proton energy the target foils arrangedB010200200009 in a stack have to be considered each as a single foil B010200200010 irradiated at 25 GeV (comment by the compiler of B010200200011 Kachapag). B010200200012 Tritium was set free from the irradiated foils by B010200200013 melting and pumping off the gases produced. B010200200014 These were separated from each other by a Pd-valve B010200200015 and were counted inside of Gm-counters. B010200200016 SAMPLE Foil stack consisting of 2*0.2 mm antimagnetic 18/20 B010200200017 steel, 3*0.04 mm Al-monitor, 2*0.2 mm Al, 1*0.5 mm Al, B010200200018 3*0.04 mm Al-monitor and 3*0.4 mm Cu. The purity of B010200200019 the Al-foils was 99.99% that of Cu 99.96% B010200200020 the beam entered the stack at the steel-foils and left B010200200021 it at the Cu-foils. Stack referred to as Ps1. B010200200022 DETECTOR (GEMUC) B010200200023 MONITOR (13-AL-27(P,X)11-NA-24,CUM,SIG) B010200200024 A cross section of 10.0 Mb at 25 GeV was assumed using B010200200025 extrapolations of cross sections measured at lower B010200200026 energies. B010200200027 Na-24-g was determined by beta-gamma coincidence B010200200028 counting of several monitor foils about 15 hours after B010200200029 the end of irradiation with an accuracy of about 2%. B010200200030 The decay of Na-24 was followed over about 5 B010200200031 half-lives. B010200200032 Na-24 produced by secondary neutrons via Al-27(n,a) B010200200033 reaction and by secondary protons was accounted for B010200200034 by using foils from the beginning of the stack. B010200200035 MONIT-REF (B0094002,K.GOEBEL+,J,NP,24,28,1961) B010200200036 (,J.B.CUMMING+,J,PR,111,1386,1958) B010200200037 (,D.W.BARR,R,UCRL-3793,1957) B010200200038 cross sections from 7 different publications ranging B010200200039 up to 6 gev are compiled in this reference. B010200200040 DECAY-MON (11-NA-24,15.03HR) B010200200041 ERR-ANALYS The error of the cross sections is about 20 %. B010200200042 Experimental errors are about 10%. B010200200043 Of the beam intensity determination is better than 10%.B010200200044 Degassing of the target foils may lead to a systematic B010200200045 loss of less than 5%. B010200200046 MISC-COL (MISC).Number of determinations yielding the cross B010200200047 section given as an average value. B010200200048 STATUS (TABLE).Table 2 of J,ZN/A,16,231,1961 B010200200049 (SPSDD,D0628005) renormalized B010200200050 ENDBIB 48 0 B010200200051 NOCOMMON 0 0 B010200200052 DATA 2 1 B010200200053 DATA MISC B010200200054 MB NO-DIM B010200200055 67. 2. B010200200056 ENDDATA 3 0 B010200200057 ENDSUBENT 56 0 B010200299999 SUBENT B0102003 20110607 B023B010200300001 BIB 13 66 B010200300002 REACTION 1(26-FE-0(P,X)1-H-3,,SIG) B010200300003 2(26-FE-0(P,X)1-H-3,,SIG) B010200300004 HISTORY (20100823A).Data were renormalized and reported in B010200300005 D0628013 (R,CERN-64-12,1964) B010200300006 RAD-DET (1-H-3,B-) B010200300007 DECAY-DATA (1-H-3,,B-) B010200300008 METHOD (INTB,SITA,MOSEP) B010200300009 Due to the high proton energy the target foils arrangedB010200300010 in a stack have to be considered each as a single foil B010200300011 irradiated at 25 GeV (comment by the compiler of B010200300012 Kachapag). B010200300013 Tritium was set free from the irradiated foils by B010200300014 melting and pumping off the gases produced. B010200300015 These were separated from each other by a Pd-valve B010200300016 and were counted inside of Gm-counters. B010200300017 SAMPLE 1foil stack consisting of 2*0.2 mm Antimagnetic 18/20 B010200300018 steel, 3*0.04 mm Al-monitor, 2*0.2 mm Al, 1*0.5 mm Al, B010200300019 3*0.04 mm Al-monitor and 3*0.4 mm Cu. The purity of B010200300020 the Al-foils was 99.99% that of Cu 99.96%. B010200300021 The beam entered the stack at the steel-foils and left B010200300022 it at the Cu-foils. Stack referred to as Ps1. B010200300023 2Foil stack consisting of 2*0.4 mm Cu, 10*0.05 mm Cu, B010200300024 20*0.005 mm Al, 6*0.2 mm Antimagnetic 18/20 steel, B010200300025 1*0.4 mm Cu and 1*1.0 mm Cu. The purity of the Al-foilsB010200300026 was 99.99% that of Cu 99.96%. The beam entered the B010200300027 stack at the 0.4 mm Cu-foils and left it at the 1.0 mm B010200300028 Cu-foil. Stack referred to as Ps2. B010200300029 DETECTOR (GEMUC) B010200300030 MONITOR (13-AL-27(P,X)11-NA-24,CUM,SIG) B010200300031 A cross section of 10.0 Mb at 25 GeV was assumed usingB010200300032 extrapolations of cross sections measured at lower B010200300033 energies. B010200300034 Na-24-g was determined by beta-gamma coincidence B010200300035 counting of several monitor foils about 15 hours after B010200300036 the end of irradiation with an accuracy of about 2%. B010200300037 The decay of Na-24 was followed over about 5 B010200300038 half-lives. B010200300039 Na-24 produced by secondary neutrons via Al-27(n,a) B010200300040 reaction and by secondary protons was accounted for B010200300041 by using foils from the beginning of the stack. B010200300042 The proton flux for the irradiation of target Ps2 was B010200300043 determined by comparing the Ar-37 cross section for Cu B010200300044 and Fe to that obtained with target Ps1, both measured B010200300045 with the Gm-counter. These monitors were used rather B010200300046 than Al-27(p,3pn)Na-24 directly, due to the long B010200300047 irradiation time of about 35 hours. They are,however, B010200300048 related to the 10 mb cross section of Al-27(p,3pn). B010200300049 MONIT-REF (B0094002,K.GOEBEL+,J,NP,24,28,1961) B010200300050 (,J.B.CUMMING+,J,PR,111,1386,1958) B010200300051 (,D.W.BARR,R,UCRL-3793,1957) B010200300052 Cross sections from 7 different publications ranging B010200300053 up to 6 GeV are compiled in this reference. B010200300054 DECAY-MON (11-NA-24,15.03HR) B010200300055 ERR-ANALYS The error of the cross sections is about 20 %. B010200300056 Experimental errors are about 10%. B010200300057 Of the beam intensity determination is better than 10%.B010200300058 Degassing of the target foils may lead to a systematic B010200300059 loss of less than 5%. B010200300060 For target Ps2 an additional error in the beam current B010200300061 determination is introduced by the flux determination B010200300062 via Ar-37 resulting in a total error for the proton B010200300063 flux of 15 to 20%. B010200300064 MISC-COL (MISC) number of determinations yielding the cross B010200300065 section given as an average value. B010200300066 STATUS (TABLE).Table 2 of J,ZN/A,16,231,1961 B010200300067 (SPSDD,D0628013) renormalized B010200300068 ENDBIB 66 0 B010200300069 NOCOMMON 0 0 B010200300070 DATA 4 1 B010200300071 DATA 1MISC 1DATA 2MISC 2 B010200300072 MB NO-DIM MB NO-DIM B010200300073 94. 2. 89. 3. B010200300074 ENDDATA 3 0 B010200300075 ENDSUBENT 74 0 B010200399999 SUBENT B0102004 20110607 B023B010200400001 BIB 13 66 B010200400002 REACTION 1(29-CU-0(P,X)1-H-3,,SIG) B010200400003 2(29-CU-0(P,X)1-H-3,,SIG) B010200400004 HISTORY (20100823A).Data were renormalized and reported in B010200400005 D0628019 (R,CERN-64-12,1964) B010200400006 RAD-DET (1-H-3,B-) B010200400007 DECAY-DATA (1-H-3,,B-) B010200400008 METHOD (INTB,SITA,MOSEP) B010200400009 Due to the high proton energy the target foils arrangedB010200400010 in a stack have to be considered each as a single foil B010200400011 irradiated at 25 GeV (comment by the compiler of B010200400012 Kachapag). B010200400013 Tritium was set free from the irradiated foils by B010200400014 melting and pumping off the gases produced. B010200400015 These were separated from each other by a Pd-valve B010200400016 and were counted inside of Gm-counters. B010200400017 SAMPLE 1Foil stack consisting of 2*0.2 mm Antimagnetic 18/20 B010200400018 steel, 3*0.04 mm Al-monitor, 2*0.2 mm Al, 1*0.5 mm Al, B010200400019 3*0.04 mm Al-monitor and 3*0.4 mm Cu. The purity of B010200400020 the Al-foils was 99.99% that of Cu 99.96%. B010200400021 The beam entered the stack at the steel-foils and left B010200400022 it at the Cu-foils. Stack referred to as Ps1. B010200400023 2Foil stack consisting of 2*0.4 mm Cu, 10*0.05 mm Cu, B010200400024 20*0.005 mm Al, 6*0.2 mm Antimagnetic 18/20 steel, B010200400025 1*0.4 mm Cu and 1*1.0 mm Cu. The purity of the Al-foilsB010200400026 was 99.99% that of Cu 99.96%. The beam entered the B010200400027 stack at the 0.4 mm Cu-foils and left it at the 1.0 mmB010200400028 Cu-foil. Stack referred to as Ps2. B010200400029 DETECTOR (GEMUC) B010200400030 MONITOR (13-AL-27(P,X)11-NA-24,CUM,SIG) B010200400031 A cross section of 10.0 Mb at 25 GeV was assumed usingB010200400032 extrapolations of cross sections measured at lower B010200400033 energies. B010200400034 Na-24-g was determined by beta-gamma coincidence B010200400035 counting of several monitor foils about 15 hours after B010200400036 the end of irradiation with an accuracy of about 2%. B010200400037 The decay of Na-24 was followed over about 5 B010200400038 half-lives. B010200400039 Na-24 produced by secondary neutrons via Al-27(n,a) B010200400040 reaction and by secondary protons was accounted for B010200400041 by using foils from the beginning of the stack. B010200400042 The proton flux for the irradiation of target Ps2 was B010200400043 determined by comparing the Ar-37 cross section for Cu B010200400044 and Fe to that obtained with target Ps1, both measured B010200400045 with the Gm-counter. These monitors were used rather B010200400046 than Al-27(p,3pn)Na-24 directly, due to the long B010200400047 irradiation time of about 35 hours. They are,however, B010200400048 related to the 10 mb cross section of Al-27(p,3pn). B010200400049 MONIT-REF (B0094002,K.GOEBEL+,J,NP,24,28,1961) B010200400050 (,J.B.CUMMING+,J,PR,111,1386,1958) B010200400051 (,D.W.BARR,R,UCRL-3793,1957) B010200400052 Cross sections from 7 different publications ranging B010200400053 up to 6 gev are compiled in this reference. B010200400054 DECAY-MON (11-NA-24,15.03HR) B010200400055 ERR-ANALYS The error of the cross sections is about 20%. B010200400056 Experimental errors are about 10%. The accuracy of theB010200400057 beam intensity determination is better than 10%. B010200400058 Degassing of the target foils may lead to a systematic B010200400059 loss of less than 5%. B010200400060 For target Ps2 an additional error in the beam current B010200400061 determination is introduced by the flux determination B010200400062 via Ar-37 resulting in a total error for the proton B010200400063 flux of 15 to 20%. B010200400064 MISC-COL (MISC) number of determinations yielding the cross B010200400065 section given as an average value. B010200400066 STATUS (TABLE).Table 2 of J,ZN/A,16,231,1961 B010200400067 (SPSDD,D0628019) renormalized B010200400068 ENDBIB 66 0 B010200400069 NOCOMMON 0 0 B010200400070 DATA 4 1 B010200400071 DATA 1MISC 1DATA 2MISC 2 B010200400072 MB NO-DIM MB NO-DIM B010200400073 137. 2. 145. 1. B010200400074 ENDDATA 3 0 B010200400075 ENDSUBENT 74 0 B010200499999 SUBENT B0102005 20110607 B023B010200500001 BIB 13 72 B010200500002 REACTION 1(26-FE-0(P,X)18-AR-37,,SIG) B010200500003 The cross section given certainly includes production B010200500004 via the shortlived precursor (comment by compiler of B010200500005 Kachapag) B010200500006 2(26-FE-0(P,X)18-AR-37,,SIG) B010200500007 The cross section given certainly includes production B010200500008 via the shortlived precursor (comment by compiler of B010200500009 Kachapag). B010200500010 HISTORY (20100823A).Data were renormalized and reported in B010200500011 D0628013 (R,CERN-64-12,1964) B010200500012 RAD-DET (18-AR-37,XR) B010200500013 DECAY-DATA (18-AR-37,34.1D) B010200500014 METHOD (INTB,SITA,MOSEP) B010200500015 Due to the high proton energy the target foils arrangedB010200500016 in a stack have to be considered each as a single foil B010200500017 irradiated at 25 GeV (comment by the compiler of B010200500018 Kachapag). B010200500019 Tritium was set free from the irradiated foils by B010200500020 melting and pumping off the gases produced. B010200500021 These were separated from each other by a Pd-valve B010200500022 and were counted inside of Gm-counters. B010200500023 SAMPLE 1Foil stack consisting of 2*0.2 mm Antimagnetic 18/20 B010200500024 steel, 3*0.04 mm Al-monitor, 2*0.2 mm Al, 1*0.5 mm Al, B010200500025 3*0.04 mm Al-monitor and 3*0.4 mm Cu. The purity of B010200500026 the Al-foils was 99.99% that of Cu 99.96%. B010200500027 The beam entered the stack at the steel-foils and left B010200500028 it at the Cu-foils. Stack referred to as Ps1. B010200500029 2Foil stack consisting of 2*0.4 mm Cu, 10*0.05 mm Cu, B010200500030 20*0.005 mm Al, 6*0.2 mm Antimagnetic 18/20 steel, B010200500031 1*0.4 mm Cu and 1*1.0 mm Cu. The purity of the Al-foilsB010200500032 was 99.99% that of Cu 99.96%. The beam entered the B010200500033 stack at the 0.4 mm Cu-foils and left it at the 1.0 mmB010200500034 Cu-foil. Stack referred to as Ps2. B010200500035 DETECTOR (GEMUC) B010200500036 MONITOR (13-AL-27(P,X)11-NA-24,CUM,SIG) B010200500037 A cross section of 10.0 Mb at 25 GeV was assumed usingB010200500038 extrapolations of cross sections measured at lower B010200500039 energies. B010200500040 Na-24-g was determined by beta-gamma coincidence B010200500041 counting of several monitor foils about 15 hours after B010200500042 the end of irradiation with an accuracy of about 2%. B010200500043 The decay of Na-24 was followed over about 5 B010200500044 half-lives. B010200500045 Na-24 produced by secondary neutrons via Al-27(n,a) B010200500046 reaction and by secondary protons was accounted for B010200500047 by using foils from the beginning of the stack. B010200500048 The proton flux for the irradiation of target Ps2 was B010200500049 determined by comparing the Ar-37 cross section for Cu B010200500050 and Fe to that obtained with target Ps1, both measured B010200500051 with the Gm-counter. These monitors were used rather B010200500052 than Al-27(p,3pn)Na-24 directly, due to the long B010200500053 irradiation time of about 35 hours. They are,however, B010200500054 related to the 10 mb cross section of Al-27(p,3pn). B010200500055 MONIT-REF (B0094002,K.GOEBEL+,J,NP,24,28,1961) B010200500056 (,J.B.CUMMING+,J,PR,111,1386,1958) B010200500057 (,D.W.BARR,R,UCRL-3793,1957) B010200500058 cross sections from 7 different publications ranging B010200500059 up to 6 gev are compiled in this reference. B010200500060 DECAY-MON (11-NA-24,15.03HR) B010200500061 ERR-ANALYS The error of the cross sections is about 20%. B010200500062 Experimental errors are about 10%. The accuracy of theB010200500063 beam intensity determination is better than 10%. B010200500064 Degassing of the target foils may lead to a systematic B010200500065 loss of less than 5%. B010200500066 For target Ps2 an additional error in the beam current B010200500067 determination is introduced by the flux determination B010200500068 via Ar-37 resulting in a total error for the proton B010200500069 flux of 15 to 20%. B010200500070 MISC-COL (MISC).Number of determinations yielding the cross B010200500071 section given as an average value. B010200500072 STATUS (TABLE).Table 2 of J,ZN/A,16,231,1961 B010200500073 (SPSDD,D0628013) renormalized B010200500074 ENDBIB 72 0 B010200500075 NOCOMMON 0 0 B010200500076 DATA 4 1 B010200500077 DATA 1MISC 1DATA 2MISC 2 B010200500078 MB NO-DIM MB NO-DIM B010200500079 5.7 2. 5.6 3. B010200500080 ENDDATA 3 0 B010200500081 ENDSUBENT 80 0 B010200599999 SUBENT B0102006 20110607 B023B010200600001 BIB 13 72 B010200600002 REACTION 1(29-CU-0(P,X)18-AR-37,,SIG) B010200600003 the cross section given certainly includes production B010200600004 via the shortlived precursor (comment by compiler of B010200600005 Kachapag). B010200600006 2(29-CU-0(P,X)18-AR-37,,SIG) B010200600007 the cross section given certainly includes production B010200600008 via the shortlived precursor (comment by compiler of B010200600009 Kachapag). B010200600010 HISTORY (20100823A).Data were renormalized and reported in B010200600011 D0628019 (R,CERN-64-12,1964) B010200600012 RAD-DET (18-AR-37,XR) B010200600013 DECAY-DATA (18-AR-37,34.1D) B010200600014 METHOD (INTB,SITA,MOSEP) B010200600015 Due to the high proton energy the target foils arrangedB010200600016 in a stack have to be considered each as a single foil B010200600017 irradiated at 25 GeV (comment by the compiler of B010200600018 Kachapag). B010200600019 Tritium was set free from the irradiated foils by B010200600020 melting and pumping off the gases produced. B010200600021 These were separated from each other by a Pd-valve B010200600022 and were counted inside of Gm-counters. B010200600023 SAMPLE 1Foil stack consisting of 2x0.2 mm Antimagnetic 18/20 B010200600024 steel, 3x0.04 mm Al-monitor, 2*0.2 mm Al, 1*0.5 mm Al, B010200600025 3*0.04 mm Al-monitor and 3*0.4 mm Cu. The purity of B010200600026 the Al-foils was 99.99% that of Cu 99.96%. B010200600027 the beam entered the stack at the steel-foils and left B010200600028 it at the Cu-foils. Stack referred to as Ps1. B010200600029 2Foil stack consisting of 2*0.4 mm Cu, 10*0.05 mm Cu, B010200600030 20*0.005 mm Al, 6*0.2 mm Antimagnetic 18/20 steel, B010200600031 1*0.4 mm Cu and 1*1.0 mm Cu. The purity of the Al-foilsB010200600032 was 99.99% that of Cu 99.96%. The beam entered the B010200600033 stack at the 0.4 mm Cu-foils and left it at the 1.0 mmB010200600034 Cu-foil. Stack referred to as Ps2. B010200600035 DETECTOR (GEMUC) B010200600036 MONITOR (13-AL-27(P,X)11-NA-24,CUM,SIG) B010200600037 A cross section of 10.0 Mb at 25 GeV was assumed usingB010200600038 extrapolations of cross sections measured at lower B010200600039 energies. B010200600040 Na-24-g was determined by beta-gamma coincidence B010200600041 counting of several monitor foils about 15 hours after B010200600042 the end of irradiation with an accuracy of about 2%. B010200600043 The decay of Na-24 was followed over about 5 B010200600044 half-lives. B010200600045 Na-24 produced by secondary neutrons via Al-27(n,a) B010200600046 reaction and by secondary protons was accounted for B010200600047 by using foils from the beginning of the stack. B010200600048 The proton flux for the irradiation of target Ps2 was B010200600049 determined by comparing the Ar-37 cross section for Cu B010200600050 and Fe to that obtained with target Ps1, both measured B010200600051 with the Gm-counter. These monitors were used rather B010200600052 than Al-27(p,3pn)Na-24 directly, due to the long B010200600053 irradiation time of about 35 hours. They are,however, B010200600054 related to the 10 mb cross section of Al-27(p,3pn). B010200600055 MONIT-REF (B0094002,K.GOEBEL+,J,NP,24,28,1961) B010200600056 (,J.B.CUMMING+,J,PR,111,1386,1958) B010200600057 (,D.W.BARR,R,UCRL-3793,1957) B010200600058 Cross sections from 7 different publications ranging B010200600059 up to 6 gev are compiled in this reference. B010200600060 DECAY-MON (11-NA-24,15.03HR) B010200600061 ERR-ANALYS The error of the cross sections is about 20%. B010200600062 Experimental errors are about 10%. The accuracy of the B010200600063 beam intensity determination is better than 10%. B010200600064 Degassing of the target foils may lead to a systematicB010200600065 loss of less than 5%. B010200600066 For target ps2 an additional error in the beam current B010200600067 determination is introduced by the flux determination B010200600068 via Ar-37 resulting in a total error for the proton B010200600069 flux of 15 to 20%. B010200600070 MISC-COL (MISC).Number of determinations yielding the cross B010200600071 section given as an average value. B010200600072 STATUS (TABLE).Table 2 of J,ZN/A,16,231,1961 B010200600073 (SPSDD,D0628019) renormalized B010200600074 ENDBIB 72 0 B010200600075 NOCOMMON 0 0 B010200600076 DATA 4 1 B010200600077 DATA 1MISC 1DATA 2MISC 2 B010200600078 MB NO-DIM MB NO-DIM B010200600079 4.4 2. 4.5 2. B010200600080 ENDDATA 3 0 B010200600081 ENDSUBENT 80 0 B010200699999 SUBENT B0102007 20110607 B023B010200700001 BIB 13 60 B010200700002 REACTION (26-FE-0(P,X)ELEM/MASS,,SIG) B010200700003 the Ne and Ar cross sections certainly include B010200700004 production via shortlived precursors (comment by the B010200700005 compiler of Kachapag). B010200700006 HISTORY (20100823A).Data were renormalized and reported in B010200700007 D0628013 (R,CERN-64-12,1964) B010200700008 PART-DET (HE3) B010200700009 (A) B010200700010 (10-NE-21) B010200700011 (10-NE-22) B010200700012 (18-AR-36) B010200700013 (18-AR-37) B010200700014 (18-AR-38) B010200700015 (18-AR-39) B010200700016 FLAG (1.) part-det is He-3. B010200700017 (2.) part-det is He-4. B010200700018 (3.) part-det is Ne-21. B010200700019 (4.) part-det is Ne-22. B010200700020 (5.) part-det is Ar-36. B010200700021 (6.) part-det is Ar-37. B010200700022 (7.) part-det is Ar-38. B010200700023 (8.) part-det is Ar-39. B010200700024 METHOD (INTB,SITA,MOMIX,ASEP) B010200700025 Due to the high proton energy the target foils arrangedB010200700026 in a stack have to be considered each as a single foil B010200700027 irradiated at 25 GeV (comment by the compiler of B010200700028 Kachapag). B010200700029 SAMPLE Foil stack consisting of 2*0.4 mm Cu, 10*0.05 mm Cu, B010200700030 20*0.005 mm Al, 6*0.2 mm Antimagnetic 18/20 steel, B010200700031 1*0.4 mm Cu and 1*1.0 mm Cu. The purity of the Al-foilsB010200700032 was 99.99% That of Cu 99.96%. The beam entered the B010200700033 stack at the 0.4 mm Cu-foils and left it at the 1.0 mmB010200700034 Cu-foil. Stack referred to as ps2. B010200700035 MONITOR (26-FE-0(P,X)18-AR-37,,SIG) B010200700036 The proton flux for the irradiation of target Ps2 was B010200700037 determined by comparing the Ar-37 cross section for Cu B010200700038 and Fe to that obtained with target Ps1, both measured B010200700039 with the Gm-counter. These monitors were used rather B010200700040 than Al-27(p,3pn)Na-24 directly, due to the long B010200700041 irradiation time of about 35 hours. They are,however, B010200700042 related to the 10 mb cross section of Al-27(p,3pn). B010200700043 A cross section of 5.7 Mb at 25 GeV for anti-magnetic B010200700044 18/20 steel was used. B010200700045 MONIT-REF (B0102005,K.GOEBEL+,J,ZN/A,16,231,1961) B010200700046 DECAY-MON (18-AR-37,34.1D) B010200700047 COMMENT For most of the products two cross section values B010200700048 obtained from 2 different iron foils of the stack are B010200700049 given. B010200700050 ERR-ANALYS The error of the cross sections is about 20%. B010200700051 The beam intensity was determined to within 15-20% due B010200700052 to the fact that the cross sections for Ar-37 were B010200700053 accurate to about 15% and that of the determination of B010200700054 Ar had an error of about 10%. B010200700055 Determination of rare gases with the mass separator B010200700056 included experimental errors of about 3 to 5% for B010200700057 He-isotopes and about 10% for Ne and Ar isotopes. B010200700058 CORRECTION Corrections were applied for the rare gas content of B010200700059 the targets originating from the air. B010200700060 STATUS (TABLE).Table 3 of J,ZN/A,16,231,1961 B010200700061 (SPSDD,D0628013) renormalized B010200700062 ENDBIB 60 0 B010200700063 NOCOMMON 0 0 B010200700064 DATA 4 15 B010200700065 ELEMENT MASS DATA FLAG B010200700066 NO-DIM NO-DIM MB NO-DIM B010200700067 2. 3. 113. 1. B010200700068 2. 3. 118. 1. B010200700069 2. 4. 675. 2. B010200700070 2. 4. 665. 2. B010200700071 10. 21. 5.4 3. B010200700072 10. 21. 6.1 3. B010200700073 10. 22. 3. 4. B010200700074 18. 36. 1.7 5. B010200700075 18. 36. 1.64 5. B010200700076 18. 37. 5.2 6. B010200700077 18. 37. 6.3 6. B010200700078 18. 38. 12.7 7. B010200700079 18. 38. 14.5 7. B010200700080 18. 39. 7.5 8. B010200700081 18. 39. 8. 8. B010200700082 ENDDATA 17 0 B010200700083 ENDSUBENT 82 0 B010200799999 SUBENT B0102008 20110607 B023B010200800001 BIB 13 59 B010200800002 REACTION (29-CU-0(P,X)ELEM/MASS,,SIG) B010200800003 the Ne and Ar cross sections certainly include B010200800004 production via shortlived precursors (comment by the B010200800005 compiler of Kachapag). B010200800006 HISTORY (20100823A).Data were renormalized and reported in B010200800007 D0628019 (R,CERN-64-12,1964) B010200800008 PART-DET (HE3) B010200800009 (A) B010200800010 (10-NE-21) B010200800011 (10-NE-22) B010200800012 (18-AR-36) B010200800013 (18-AR-37) B010200800014 (18-AR-38) B010200800015 (18-AR-39) B010200800016 FLAG (1.) part-det is He-3. B010200800017 (2.) part-det is He-4. B010200800018 (3.) part-det is Ne-21. B010200800019 (4.) part-det is Ne-22. B010200800020 (5.) part-det is Ar-36. B010200800021 (6.) part-det is Ar-37. B010200800022 (7.) part-det is Ar-38. B010200800023 (8.) part-det is Ar-39. B010200800024 METHOD (INTB,SITA,MOMIX,ASEP) B010200800025 Due to the high proton energy the target foils arrangeB010200800026 in a stack have to be considered each as a single foil B010200800027 irradiated at 25 GeV (comment by the compiler of B010200800028 Kachapag). B010200800029 SAMPLE Foil stack consisting of 2*0.4 mm Cu, 10*0.05 mm Cu, B010200800030 20*0.005 mm Al, 6*0.2 mm Antimagnetic 18/20 steel, B010200800031 1*0.4 mm Cu and 1*1.0 mm Cu. The purity of the Al-foilsB010200800032 was 99.99% that of Cu 99.96%. The beam entered the B010200800033 stack at the 0.4 mm Cu-foils and left it at the 1.0 mmB010200800034 Cu-foil. Stack referred to as Ps2. B010200800035 MONITOR (29-CU-0(P,X)18-AR-37,,SIG) B010200800036 The proton flux for the irradiation of target Ps2 was B010200800037 determined by comparing the Ar-37 cross section for Cu B010200800038 and Fe to that obtained with target Ps1, both measured B010200800039 with the Gm-counter. These monitors were used rather B010200800040 than Al-27(p,3pn)Na-24 directly, due to the long B010200800041 irradiation time of about 35 hours. They are,however, B010200800042 related to the 10 mb cross section of Al-27(p,3pn). B010200800043 a cross section of 4.4 Mb at 25 gev was used. B010200800044 MONIT-REF (B0102006,K.GOEBEL+,J,ZN/A,16,231,1961) B010200800045 DECAY-MON (18-AR-37,34.1D) B010200800046 ERR-ANALYS The error of the cross sections is about 20%. B010200800047 The beam intensity was determined to within 15-20% due B010200800048 to the fact that the cross sections for Ar-37 were B010200800049 accurate to about 15% and that of the determination of B010200800050 Ar had an error of about 10%. Determination of rare B010200800051 gases with the mass separator included experimental B010200800052 errors of about 3 to 5% for He-isotopes and about 10% B010200800053 for Ne and Ar isotopes. B010200800054 CORRECTION Corrections were applied for the rare gas content of B010200800055 the targets originating from the air. B010200800056 ADD-RES (COMP) cross sections are compared to values calculatedB010200800057 on the basis of the rudstam formula. B010200800058 Agreement was found for the Ar-isotopes only. B010200800059 STATUS (TABLE).Table 3 of J,ZN/A,16,231,1961 B010200800060 (SPSDD,D0628019) renormalized B010200800061 ENDBIB 59 0 B010200800062 NOCOMMON 0 0 B010200800063 DATA 4 8 B010200800064 ELEMENT MASS DATA FLAG B010200800065 NO-DIM NO-DIM MB NO-DIM B010200800066 2. 3. 114. 1. B010200800067 2. 4. 695. 2. B010200800068 10. 21. 6.4 3. B010200800069 10. 22. 3.6 4. B010200800070 18. 36. 1. 5. B010200800071 18. 37. 4. 6. B010200800072 18. 38. 9.3 7. B010200800073 18. 39. 5.3 8. B010200800074 ENDDATA 10 0 B010200800075 ENDSUBENT 74 0 B010200899999 ENDENTRY 8 0 B010299999999