ENTRY C2017 20130709 C133C201700000001 SUBENT C2017001 20130709 C133C201700100001 BIB 13 22 C201700100002 TITLE Half-life of 101Ag and formation cross section from C201700100003 Ag and In C201700100004 AUTHOR (J.A.Panontin,A.A.Caretto Jr) C201700100005 INSTITUTE (1USACAR) C201700100006 REFERENCE (J,JIN,28,1795,1966) C201700100007 FACILITY (SYNCY,1USACAR) Experiment performed using internal C201700100008 circulating proton beam of the Carnegie Institute of C201700100009 Technology synchrocyclotron C201700100010 DETECTOR (NAICR) Activities were measured using a 3in. x 3in. C201700100011 NaI(Tl) connected to 256 multichannel analyser. C201700100012 METHOD (ACTIV,CHSEP) C201700100013 MONITOR (13-AL-27(N,A)11-NA-24,,SIG) C201700100014 MONIT-REF (,J.B.Cumming,J,ARN,13,261,1963) C201700100015 ANALYSIS Cross section was determined from analysis of decay C201700100016 curve relative to the monitor cross section C201700100017 ERR-ANALYS (DATA-ERR)Standard deviation of duplicate determinationC201700100018 (ERR-T) Total estimated uncertainty C201700100019 (ERR-1) Systematic uncert. in detection efficiency C201700100020 (ERR-2) Syst. uncertainty in monitor cross section C201700100021 (ERR-3) Syst. uncertainty in X-ray branching ratio C201700100022 DECAY-DATA (47-AG-101-G,11.2MIN,B+) Measured by authors C201700100023 HISTORY (20130709C) Compiled by S.H. C201700100024 ENDBIB 22 0 C201700100025 COMMON 5 3 C201700100026 ERR-T ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 ERR-HL C201700100027 PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT MIN C201700100028 20.0 5.0 6.5 10.0 0.1 C201700100029 ENDCOMMON 3 0 C201700100030 ENDSUBENT 29 0 C201700199999 SUBENT C2017002 20130709 C133C201700200001 BIB 3 8 C201700200002 REACTION (47-AG-0(P,X)47-AG-101,,SIG) C201700200003 STATUS (TABLE) Data taken from tab. 1 of the reference C201700200004 SAMPLE Natural Ag foil of 99.99% purity with thickness of 3 C201700200005 mil (0.0762mm) surrounded by l mil aluminum catcher C201700200006 foils of high purity, followed by 1-mil aluminum C201700200007 monitor foils and wrapped with 1-mil aluminum. The C201700200008 dimensions of the target and each foil were 1in. x 1in.C201700200009 (2.54 cm x 2.54 cm) C201700200010 ENDBIB 8 0 C201700200011 NOCOMMON 0 0 C201700200012 DATA 3 2 C201700200013 EN DATA DATA-ERR C201700200014 MEV MB MB C201700200015 200.0 12.4 0.7 C201700200016 400.0 7.14 0.01 C201700200017 ENDDATA 4 0 C201700200018 ENDSUBENT 17 0 C201700299999 SUBENT C2017003 20130709 C133C201700300001 BIB 3 8 C201700300002 REACTION (49-IN-0(P,X)47-AG-101,,SIG) C201700300003 STATUS (TABLE) Data taken from tab. 1 of the reference C201700300004 SAMPLE Natural In foil of 99.99% purity with thickness of 2 C201700300005 mil (0.0508mm) surrounded by l mil aluminum catcher C201700300006 foils of high purity, followed by 1-mil aluminum C201700300007 monitor foils and wrapped with 1-mil aluminum. The C201700300008 dimensions of the target and each foil were 1in. x 1in.C201700300009 (2.54 cm x 2.54 cm) C201700300010 ENDBIB 8 0 C201700300011 NOCOMMON 0 0 C201700300012 DATA 3 2 C201700300013 EN DATA DATA-ERR C201700300014 MEV MB MB C201700300015 200.0 2.24 0.10 C201700300016 400.0 5.15 0.18 C201700300017 ENDDATA 4 0 C201700300018 ENDSUBENT 17 0 C201700399999 ENDENTRY 3 0 C201799999999