ENTRY D0357 20190820 D121D035700000001 SUBENT D0357001 20190820 D121D035700100001 BIB 13 54 D035700100002 TITLE Production of no-carrier-added 139Pr via precursor D035700100003 decay in the proton bombardment of natPr D035700100004 AUTHOR (G.F.Steyn,C.Vermeulen,F.M.Nortier,F.Szelecsenyi, D035700100005 Z.Kovacs,S.M.Qaim) D035700100006 INSTITUTE (3SAFITH,1USALAS,3HUNDEB,2GERJUL) D035700100007 REFERENCE (J,NIM/B,252,149,2006) D035700100008 (C,2004SANTA,,1650,2004) prelim. results D035700100009 FACILITY (CYCLO,3SAFITH) iThemba LABS in Faure, South Africa D035700100010 METHOD (ACTIV,GSPEC,EXTB) D035700100011 All the cross-section values are for the direct D035700100012 production of the particular radionuclide. In the case D035700100013 of 138mPr there is no feeding from precursor decay. D035700100014 In the case of the other Pr radionuclides, appropriate D035700100015 corrections were made to subtract the contributions D035700100016 from precursor decay. D035700100017 MONITOR (13-AL-27(P,X)11-NA-22,,SIG) The standard 22Na D035700100018 excitation function obtained previously by means of D035700100019 foil-stack activations inside a calibrated Faraday D035700100020 cup, was used. D035700100021 MONIT-REF (A0497002,G.F.Steyn,J,ARI,41,315,1990) D035700100022 DECAY-DATA The cross sections of the observed activation D035700100023 products were calculated from their measured D035700100024 gamma-ray emissions using disintegration data D035700100025 from the catalogue of Firestone et al., Table of D035700100026 Radioactive Isotopes, Version 2.1, January 2004. D035700100027 Available from URL: http://ie.lbl.gov/toi. D035700100028 DETECTOR (HPGE) An accurately calibrated HPGe detector with a D035700100029 relative efficiency of 13% and a resolution of D035700100030 1.8 keV at 1.33 MeV was used for this purpose. D035700100031 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-SYS) The constant component includes: D035700100032 (ERR-1) uncertainty in the beam current integration D035700100033 (ERR-2) uncertainty in the detector efficiency D035700100034 (ERR-3) uncertainty in the counting geometry D035700100035 (ERR-4) uncertainty in the decay corrections D035700100036 (ERR-5) uncertainty in the foil thickness D035700100037 (ERR-T) The total uncertainties in the measured cross D035700100038 sections were obtained by summing all the contributing D035700100039 uncertainties in quadrature. A variable component D035700100040 includes the uncertainty due to counting statistics andD035700100041 photo-peak integration as well as the uncertainty D035700100042 associated with the beam-loss correction. The latter D035700100043 did not exceed 1.6%. D035700100044 (EN-ERR) The uncertainty in energy of each measured datD035700100045 point was estimated from the uncertainty in incident beD035700100046 energy, foil thickness and depth of penetration D035700100047 in the stack D035700100048 STATUS (TABLE) Data were received from Dr. G.F.Steyn D035700100049 (APRVD) Entry was approved by Dr. G.F.Steyn D035700100050 HISTORY (20060609C) SD D035700100051 (20061122U) First ref. added. Statistical uncertaintiesD035700100052 were changed on total according to final presentation D035700100053 in the article. D035700100054 (20190820A) SD: REACTION code updated according to new D035700100055 EXFOR rules in Subents 012-014. D035700100056 ENDBIB 54 0 D035700100057 COMMON 7 6 D035700100058 EN-ERR ERR-SYS ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 ERR-4 D035700100059 ERR-5 D035700100060 MEV PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT D035700100061 PER-CENT D035700100062 1. 7. 3. 5. 1. 2. D035700100063 3. D035700100064 ENDCOMMON 6 0 D035700100065 ENDSUBENT 64 0 D035700199999 SUBENT D0357002 20061122 D049D035700200001 BIB 2 11 D035700200002 REACTION (59-PR-141(P,7N)60-ND-135-G,,SIG) D035700200003 SAMPLE Six composite foil stacks were irradiated, two at each D035700200004 primary proton-beam energy of 97.8+-0.5, 65.5+-0.4 and D035700200005 39.6+-0.3 MeV. The stacks consisted of high-purity Pr D035700200006 foils of 100 mu-m thickness (99.9%), high-purity D035700200007 Al monitor foils of 250 mu-m thickness (99.999%) and D035700200008 groups of 125 mu-m thick Cu degrader foils (99.9%) as D035700200009 required to obtain well spaced proton energies across D035700200010 the entire energy region of interest. D035700200011 All the foils had a diameter of 19 mm and their D035700200012 individual thicknesses were determined by weighing. D035700200013 ENDBIB 11 0 D035700200014 NOCOMMON 0 0 D035700200015 DATA 4 8 D035700200016 EN EN-ERR DATA ERR-T D035700200017 MEV MEV MB MB D035700200018 71.6 1.59 7.1 1.76 D035700200019 75.4 1.45 18.1 2.07 D035700200020 78.7 1.31 33.3 2.71 D035700200021 82.4 1.18 48.5 3.74 D035700200022 86.2 1.06 51.9 3.86 D035700200023 89.6 0.94 55.1 4.09 D035700200024 93.2 0.83 47.5 3.52 D035700200025 96.5 0.72 41.3 3.07 D035700200026 ENDDATA 10 0 D035700200027 ENDSUBENT 26 0 D035700299999 SUBENT D0357003 20061122 D049D035700300001 BIB 2 11 D035700300002 REACTION (59-PR-141(P,6N)60-ND-136,,SIG) D035700300003 SAMPLE Six composite foil stacks were irradiated, two at each D035700300004 primary proton-beam energy of 97.8+-0.5, 65.5+-0.4 and D035700300005 39.6+-0.3 MeV. The stacks consisted ofhigh-purity Pr D035700300006 foils of 100 mu-m thickness (99.9%), high-purity D035700300007 Al monitor foils of 250 mu-m thickness (99.999%) and D035700300008 groups of 125 mu-m thick Cu degrader foils (99.9%) as D035700300009 required to obtain well spaced proton energies across D035700300010 the entire energy region of interest. D035700300011 All the foils had a diameter of 19 mm and their D035700300012 individual thicknesses were determined by weighing. D035700300013 ENDBIB 11 0 D035700300014 NOCOMMON 0 0 D035700300015 DATA 4 13 D035700300016 EN EN-ERR DATA ERR-T D035700300017 MEV MEV MB MB D035700300018 60.4 2.08 30.1 6.25 D035700300019 61.4 0.71 35.2 3.36 D035700300020 63.7 0.62 64.1 5.33 D035700300021 64.0 1.90 72.5 8.36 D035700300022 67.8 1.74 111.1 11.1 D035700300023 71.6 1.59 127.3 11.9 D035700300024 75.4 1.45 129.1 12.1 D035700300025 78.7 1.31 110.9 10.8 D035700300026 82.4 1.18 91.4 9.46 D035700300027 86.2 1.06 72.4 8.15 D035700300028 89.6 0.94 55.6 6.99 D035700300029 93.2 0.83 51.4 7.23 D035700300030 96.5 0.72 46.8 6.60 D035700300031 ENDDATA 15 0 D035700300032 ENDSUBENT 31 0 D035700399999 SUBENT D0357004 20061122 D049D035700400001 BIB 2 11 D035700400002 REACTION (59-PR-141(P,5N)60-ND-137-G,,SIG) D035700400003 SAMPLE Six composite foil stacks were irradiated, two at each D035700400004 primary proton-beam energy of 97.8+-0.5, 65.5+-0.4 and D035700400005 39.6+-0.3 MeV. The stacks consisted ofhigh-purity Pr D035700400006 foils of 100 mu-m thickness (99.9%), high-purity D035700400007 Al monitor foils of 250 mu-m thickness (99.999%) and D035700400008 groups of 125 mu-m thick Cu degrader foils (99.9%) as D035700400009 required to obtain well spaced proton energies across D035700400010 the entire energy region of interest. D035700400011 All the foils had a diameter of 19 mm and their D035700400012 individual thicknesses were determined by weighing. D035700400013 ENDBIB 11 0 D035700400014 NOCOMMON 0 0 D035700400015 DATA 4 21 D035700400016 EN EN-ERR DATA ERR-T D035700400017 MEV MEV MB MB D035700400018 44.1 1.31 11.3 1.88 D035700400019 47.0 1.21 70.9 5.79 D035700400020 50.3 1.13 216.8 15.8 D035700400021 53.0 1.04 315.6 22.7 D035700400022 53.2 2.52 334.4 27.1 D035700400023 56.1 0.97 405.1 28.9 D035700400024 56.8 2.29 408.0 31.8 D035700400025 58.5 0.90 421.8 30.1 D035700400026 60.4 2.08 399.2 31.1 D035700400027 61.4 0.71 328.6 23.4 D035700400028 63.7 0.62 322.8 23.1 D035700400029 64.0 1.90 326.3 25.6 D035700400030 67.8 1.74 234.8 19.3 D035700400031 71.6 1.59 187.5 15.6 D035700400032 75.4 1.45 137.4 12.3 D035700400033 78.7 1.31 117.2 12.7 D035700400034 82.4 1.18 100.9 9.56 D035700400035 86.2 1.06 91.3 8.90 D035700400036 89.6 0.94 84.3 8.28 D035700400037 93.2 0.83 71.5 7.91 D035700400038 96.5 0.72 71.3 7.57 D035700400039 ENDDATA 23 0 D035700400040 ENDSUBENT 39 0 D035700499999 SUBENT D0357005 20061122 D049D035700500001 BIB 2 11 D035700500002 REACTION (59-PR-141(P,4N)60-ND-138,,SIG) D035700500003 SAMPLE Six composite foil stacks were irradiated, two at each D035700500004 primary proton-beam energy of 97.8+-0.5, 65.5+-0.4 and D035700500005 39.6+-0.3 MeV. The stacks consisted ofhigh-purity Pr D035700500006 foils of 100 mu-m thickness (99.9%), high-purity D035700500007 Al monitor foils of 250 mu-m thickness (99.999%) and D035700500008 groups of 125 mu-m thick Cu degrader foils (99.9%) as D035700500009 required to obtain well spaced proton energies across D035700500010 the entire energy region of interest. D035700500011 All the foils had a diameter of 19 mm and their D035700500012 individual thicknesses were determined by weighing. D035700500013 ENDBIB 11 0 D035700500014 NOCOMMON 0 0 D035700500015 DATA 4 25 D035700500016 EN EN-ERR DATA ERR-T D035700500017 MEV MEV MB MB D035700500018 34.3 0.61 129.4 12.6 D035700500019 37.1 1.55 290.1 26.0 D035700500020 37.2 0.55 383.9 29.0 D035700500021 40.5 1.42 647.8 47.2 D035700500022 44.1 1.31 776.5 55.8 D035700500023 47.0 1.21 716.7 51.6 D035700500024 50.3 1.13 558.4 40.4 D035700500025 53.0 1.04 422.5 30.9 D035700500026 53.2 2.52 425.9 32.1 D035700500027 56.1 0.97 299.0 22.3 D035700500028 56.8 2.29 276.7 21.4 D035700500029 58.5 0.90 231.5 17.7 D035700500030 60.4 2.08 206.8 16.4 D035700500031 61.4 0.71 191.7 15.0 D035700500032 63.7 0.62 172.6 14.02 D035700500033 64.0 1.90 172.8 13.6 D035700500034 67.8 1.74 141.0 11.8 D035700500035 71.6 1.59 132.9 11.1 D035700500036 75.4 1.45 113.6 9.90 D035700500037 78.7 1.31 103.8 9.22 D035700500038 82.4 1.18 96.4 8.72 D035700500039 86.2 1.06 88.6 8.33 D035700500040 89.6 0.94 78.8 7.54 D035700500041 93.2 0.83 75.9 7.69 D035700500042 96.5 0.72 65.3 6.96 D035700500043 ENDDATA 27 0 D035700500044 ENDSUBENT 43 0 D035700599999 SUBENT D0357006 20061122 D049D035700600001 BIB 2 11 D035700600002 REACTION (59-PR-141(P,3N)60-ND-139-G,,SIG) D035700600003 SAMPLE Six composite foil stacks were irradiated, two at each D035700600004 primary proton-beam energy of 97.8+-0.5, 65.5+-0.4 and D035700600005 39.6+-0.3 MeV. The stacks consisted ofhigh-purity Pr D035700600006 foils of 100 mu-m thickness (99.9%), high-purity D035700600007 Al monitor foils of 250 mu-m thickness (99.999%) and D035700600008 groups of 125 mu-m thick Cu degrader foils (99.9%) as D035700600009 required to obtain well spaced proton energies across D035700600010 the entire energy region of interest. D035700600011 All the foils had a diameter of 19 mm and their D035700600012 individual thicknesses were determined by weighing. D035700600013 ENDBIB 11 0 D035700600014 NOCOMMON 0 0 D035700600015 DATA 4 19 D035700600016 EN EN-ERR DATA ERR-T D035700600017 MEV MEV MB MB D035700600018 23.5 1.06 34.8 2.54 D035700600019 26.2 0.94 189.5 13.6 D035700600020 28.5 0.87 256.9 18.3 D035700600021 30.5 0.76 312.1 22.7 D035700600022 31.9 0.71 276.7 19.7 D035700600023 33.8 0.66 248.1 17.7 D035700600024 34.3 0.61 269.8 19.8 D035700600025 37.1 1.55 171.1 12.3 D035700600026 37.2 0.55 174.2 13.0 D035700600027 40.5 1.42 107.4 8.71 D035700600028 44.1 1.31 62.5 5.42 D035700600029 47.0 1.21 48.2 4.65 D035700600030 50.3 1.13 36.0 3.84 D035700600031 53.0 1.04 29.8 4.16 D035700600032 56.1 0.97 29.3 3.63 D035700600033 56.8 2.29 41.1 8.88 D035700600034 58.5 0.90 31.5 3.05 D035700600035 61.4 0.71 24.6 2.87 D035700600036 63.7 0.62 24.7 3.55 D035700600037 ENDDATA 21 0 D035700600038 ENDSUBENT 37 0 D035700699999 SUBENT D0357007 20061122 D049D035700700001 BIB 3 12 D035700700002 REACTION (59-PR-141(P,3N)60-ND-139-M,,SIG) D035700700003 SAMPLE Six composite foil stacks were irradiated, two at each D035700700004 primary proton-beam energy of 97.8+-0.5, 65.5+-0.4 and D035700700005 39.6+-0.3 MeV. The stacks consisted ofhigh-purity Pr D035700700006 foils of 100 mu-m thickness (99.9%), high-purity D035700700007 Al monitor foils of 250 mu-m thickness (99.999%) and D035700700008 groups of 125 mu-m thick Cu degrader foils (99.9%) as D035700700009 required to obtain well spaced proton energies across D035700700010 the entire energy region of interest. D035700700011 All the foils had a diameter of 19 mm and their D035700700012 individual thicknesses were determined by weighing. D035700700013 DECAY-DATA (60-ND-139-M,5.5HR) D035700700014 ENDBIB 12 0 D035700700015 NOCOMMON 0 0 D035700700016 DATA 4 31 D035700700017 EN EN-ERR DATA ERR-T D035700700018 MEV MEV MB MB D035700700019 23.5 1.06 52.1 3.84 D035700700020 26.2 0.94 307.5 21.7 D035700700021 28.5 0.87 517.4 36.4 D035700700022 30.5 0.76 664.6 50.0 D035700700023 31.9 0.71 693.2 48.7 D035700700024 33.8 0.66 711.1 49.9 D035700700025 34.3 0.61 668.6 47.2 D035700700026 37.1 1.55 576.9 40.5 D035700700027 37.2 0.55 507.4 35.8 D035700700028 40.5 1.42 308.7 21.8 D035700700029 44.1 1.31 173.9 12.3 D035700700030 47.0 1.21 126.3 8.92 D035700700031 50.3 1.13 101.8 7.20 D035700700032 53.0 1.04 87.8 6.21 D035700700033 53.2 2.52 91.2 6.61 D035700700034 56.1 0.97 77.5 5.48 D035700700035 56.8 2.29 79.3 5.72 D035700700036 58.5 0.90 73.2 5.18 D035700700037 60.4 2.08 69.8 5.03 D035700700038 61.4 0.71 66.1 4.68 D035700700039 63.4 0.62 60.9 4.32 D035700700040 64.0 1.90 63.3 4.57 D035700700041 67.8 1.74 58.0 4.17 D035700700042 71.6 1.59 54.5 3.91 D035700700043 75.4 1.45 47.8 3.43 D035700700044 78.7 1.31 43.9 3.15 D035700700045 82.4 1.18 43.0 3.08 D035700700046 86.2 1.06 38.4 2.76 D035700700047 89.6 0.94 36.5 2.62 D035700700048 93.2 0.83 32.7 2.36 D035700700049 96.5 0.72 32.4 2.33 D035700700050 ENDDATA 33 0 D035700700051 ENDSUBENT 50 0 D035700799999 SUBENT D0357008 20061122 D049D035700800001 BIB 2 11 D035700800002 REACTION (59-PR-141(P,N)60-ND-141-G,,SIG) D035700800003 SAMPLE Six composite foil stacks were irradiated, two at each D035700800004 primary proton-beam energy of 97.8+-0.5, 65.5+-0.4 and D035700800005 39.6+-0.3 MeV. The stacks consisted ofhigh-purity Pr D035700800006 foils of 100 mu-m thickness (99.9%), high-purity D035700800007 Al monitor foils of 250 mu-m thickness (99.999%) and D035700800008 groups of 125 mu-m thick Cu degrader foils (99.9%) as D035700800009 required to obtain well spaced proton energies across D035700800010 the entire energy region of interest. D035700800011 All the foils had a diameter of 19 mm and their D035700800012 individual thicknesses were determined by weighing. D035700800013 ENDBIB 11 0 D035700800014 NOCOMMON 0 0 D035700800015 DATA 4 7 D035700800016 EN EN-ERR DATA ERR-T D035700800017 MEV MEV MB MB D035700800018 6.8 2.43 44.0 5.22 D035700800019 9.4 2.09 277.6 22.1 D035700800020 13.0 1.82 559.5 42.0 D035700800021 14.8 1.58 353.3 27.4 D035700800022 18.1 1.37 106.9 9.84 D035700800023 20.8 1.20 56.9 6.30 D035700800024 23.5 1.06 50.6 11.5 D035700800025 ENDDATA 9 0 D035700800026 ENDSUBENT 25 0 D035700899999 SUBENT D0357009 20061122 D049D035700900001 BIB 2 11 D035700900002 REACTION (59-PR-141(P,X)59-PR-136,,SIG) D035700900003 SAMPLE Six composite foil stacks were irradiated, two at each D035700900004 primary proton-beam energy of 97.8+-0.5, 65.5+-0.4 and D035700900005 39.6+-0.3 MeV. The stacks consisted ofhigh-purity Pr D035700900006 foils of 100 mu-m thickness (99.9%), high-purity D035700900007 Al monitor foils of 250 mu-m thickness (99.999%) and D035700900008 groups of 125 mu-m thick Cu degrader foils (99.9%) as D035700900009 required to obtain well spaced proton energies across D035700900010 the entire energy region of interest. D035700900011 All the foils had a diameter of 19 mm and their D035700900012 individual thicknesses were determined by weighing. D035700900013 ENDBIB 11 0 D035700900014 NOCOMMON 0 0 D035700900015 DATA 4 17 D035700900016 EN EN-ERR DATA ERR-T D035700900017 MEV MEV MB MB D035700900018 53.0 1.04 1.8 0.40 D035700900019 56.1 0.97 7.5 0.66 D035700900020 56.8 2.29 19.1 2.16 D035700900021 58.5 0.90 21.1 1.57 D035700900022 60.4 2.08 37.1 7.06 D035700900023 61.4 0.71 20.3 2.71 D035700900024 63.4 0.62 46.4 4.40 D035700900025 64.0 1.90 79.4 9.28 D035700900026 67.8 1.74 129.6 12.7 D035700900027 71.6 1.59 153.1 13.8 D035700900028 75.4 1.45 151.4 13.8 D035700900029 78.7 1.31 144.2 12.9 D035700900030 82.4 1.18 137.2 12.2 D035700900031 86.2 1.06 122.4 10.9 D035700900032 89.6 0.94 124.3 10.7 D035700900033 93.2 0.83 108.2 10.0 D035700900034 96.5 0.72 105.8 9.52 D035700900035 ENDDATA 19 0 D035700900036 ENDSUBENT 35 0 D035700999999 SUBENT D0357010 20061122 D049D035701000001 BIB 3 12 D035701000002 REACTION (59-PR-141(P,X)59-PR-137,,SIG) D035701000003 DECAY-DATA (59-PR-137,1.28HR) D035701000004 SAMPLE Six composite foil stacks were irradiated, two at each D035701000005 primary proton-beam energy of 97.8+-0.5, 65.5+-0.4 and D035701000006 39.6+-0.3 MeV. The stacks consisted ofhigh-purity Pr D035701000007 foils of 100 mu-m thickness (99.9%), high-purity D035701000008 Al monitor foils of 250 mu-m thickness (99.999%) and D035701000009 groups of 125 mu-m thick Cu degrader foils (99.9%) as D035701000010 required to obtain well spaced proton energies across D035701000011 the entire energy region of interest. D035701000012 All the foils had a diameter of 19 mm and their D035701000013 individual thicknesses were determined by weighing. D035701000014 ENDBIB 12 0 D035701000015 NOCOMMON 0 0 D035701000016 DATA 4 19 D035701000017 EN EN-ERR DATA ERR-T D035701000018 MEV MEV MB MB D035701000019 50.3 1.13 503.6 91.9 D035701000020 53.0 1.04 741.5 94.9 D035701000021 53.2 2.52 722.5 124.1 D035701000022 56.1 0.97 861.38 94.2 D035701000023 56.8 2.29 925.6 129.8 D035701000024 58.5 0.90 1029.8 103.9 D035701000025 60.4 2.08 999.5 122.2 D035701000026 61.4 0.71 887.6 91.4 D035701000027 63.4 0.62 804.0 82.5 D035701000028 64.0 1.90 788.2 108.5 D035701000029 67.8 1.74 639.4 88.0 D035701000030 71.6 1.59 642.5 108.3 D035701000031 75.4 1.45 544.9 96.3 D035701000032 78.7 1.31 380.4 79.7 D035701000033 82.4 1.18 381.3 70.5 D035701000034 86.2 1.06 351.6 79.8 D035701000035 89.6 0.94 238.4 55.7 D035701000036 93.2 0.83 224.9 55.4 D035701000037 96.5 0.72 279.2 55.3 D035701000038 ENDDATA 21 0 D035701000039 ENDSUBENT 38 0 D035701099999 SUBENT D0357011 20061122 D049D035701100001 BIB 2 11 D035701100002 REACTION (59-PR-141(P,X)59-PR-138-M,,SIG) D035701100003 SAMPLE Six composite foil stacks were irradiated, two at each D035701100004 primary proton-beam energy of 97.8+-0.5, 65.5+-0.4 and D035701100005 39.6+-0.3 MeV. The stacks consisted ofhigh-purity Pr D035701100006 foils of 100 mu-m thickness (99.9%), high-purity D035701100007 Al monitor foils of 250 mu-m thickness (99.999%) and D035701100008 groups of 125 mu-m thick Cu degrader foils (99.9%) as D035701100009 required to obtain well spaced proton energies across D035701100010 the entire energy region of interest. D035701100011 All the foils had a diameter of 19 mm and their D035701100012 individual thicknesses were determined by weighing. D035701100013 ENDBIB 11 0 D035701100014 NOCOMMON 0 0 D035701100015 DATA 4 27 D035701100016 EN EN-ERR DATA ERR-T D035701100017 MEV MEV MB MB D035701100018 31.9 0.71 3.0 0.61 D035701100019 33.8 0.66 3.2 0.62 D035701100020 34.3 0.61 5.5 0.65 D035701100021 37.1 1.55 6.2 0.82 D035701100022 37.2 0.55 8.9 0.85 D035701100023 40.5 1.42 22.1 1.72 D035701100024 44.1 1.31 44.7 3.26 D035701100025 47.0 1.21 60.8 4.38 D035701100026 50.3 1.13 75.9 5.43 D035701100027 53.0 1.04 77.4 5.52 D035701100028 53.2 2.52 81.0 5.94 D035701100029 56.1 0.97 76.2 5.43 D035701100030 56.8 2.29 77.4 5.67 D035701100031 58.5 0.90 75.9 5.40 D035701100032 60.4 2.08 73.5 5.36 D035701100033 61.4 0.71 73.6 5.25 D035701100034 63.4 0.62 69.6 4.96 D035701100035 64.0 1.90 70.2 5.12 D035701100036 67.8 1.74 68.3 4.95 D035701100037 71.6 1.59 66.6 4.82 D035701100038 75.4 1.45 63.4 4.57 D035701100039 78.7 1.31 61.6 4.43 D035701100040 82.4 1.18 59.0 4.21 D035701100041 86.2 1.06 56.8 4.04 D035701100042 89.6 0.94 54.1 3.84 D035701100043 93.2 0.83 52.4 3.71 D035701100044 96.5 0.72 51.9 3.67 D035701100045 ENDDATA 29 0 D035701100046 ENDSUBENT 45 0 D035701199999 SUBENT D0357012 20190820 D121D035701200001 BIB 6 13 D035701200002 REACTION (58-CE-OXI(P,X)59-PR-139,,TTY,,PHY) D035701200003 DECAY-DATA (59-PR-139,4.41HR) D035701200004 SAMPLE Tablets of anhydrous CeCl3. In each case the target D035701200005 tablet was thick enough to stop the beam. A primary D035701200006 proton beam of 66 MeV was degraded to each desired D035701200007 energy by means of an accurately machined Cu degrader D035701200008 in front of each target tablet. D035701200009 METHOD These irradiations were performed in an accurately D035701200010 calibrated Faraday chamber D035701200011 COMMENT D.Steyn (2019-07-10): Directly measured physical D035701200012 yield for a CeO2 target. D035701200013 HISTORY (20190820A) SD: SF1=Ce-140 -> Ce-OXI; SF3=2N -> X; D035701200014 SF8=DT -> PHY in REACTION code. COMMENT added. D035701200015 ENDBIB 13 0 D035701200016 NOCOMMON 0 0 D035701200017 DATA 3 3 D035701200018 EN DATA ERR-T D035701200019 MEV MCI/MUAHR MCI/MUAHR D035701200020 20. 32.6 0.15 D035701200021 26. 88.9 0.25 D035701200022 32. 122.0 0.33 D035701200023 ENDDATA 5 0 D035701200024 ENDSUBENT 23 0 D035701299999 SUBENT D0357013 20190820 D121D035701300001 BIB 6 13 D035701300002 REACTION (58-CE-OXI(P,X)59-PR-138-M,,TTY,,PHY) D035701300003 DECAY-DATA (59-PR-138-M,2.12HR) D035701300004 SAMPLE Tablets of anhydrous CeCl3. In each case the target D035701300005 tablet was thick enough to stop the beam. A primary D035701300006 proton beam of 66 MeV was degraded to each desired D035701300007 energy by means of an accurately machined Cu degrader D035701300008 in front of each target tablet. D035701300009 METHOD These irradiations were performed in an accurately D035701300010 calibrated Faraday chamber D035701300011 COMMENT D.Steyn (2019-07-10): Directly measured physical D035701300012 yield for a CeO2 target. D035701300013 HISTORY (20190820A) SD: SF1=Ce-140 -> Ce-OXI; SF3=3N -> X; D035701300014 SF8=DT -> PHY in REACTION code. COMMENT added. D035701300015 ENDBIB 13 0 D035701300016 NOCOMMON 0 0 D035701300017 DATA 3 2 D035701300018 EN DATA ERR-T D035701300019 MEV MCI/MUAHR MCI/MUAHR D035701300020 26. 1.82 0.02 D035701300021 32. 32.8 0.08 D035701300022 ENDDATA 4 0 D035701300023 ENDSUBENT 22 0 D035701399999 SUBENT D0357014 20190820 D121D035701400001 BIB 6 14 D035701400002 REACTION (58-CE-OXI(P,X)59-PR-142,,TTY,,PHY) D035701400003 SAMPLE Tablets of anhydrous CeCl3. In each case the target D035701400004 tablet was thick enough to stop the beam. A primary D035701400005 proton beam of 66 MeV was degraded to each desired D035701400006 energy by means of an accurately machined Cu degrader D035701400007 in front of each target tablet. D035701400008 METHOD These irradiations were performed in an accurately D035701400009 calibrated Faraday chamber D035701400010 DECAY-DATA (59-PR-142-G,19.13HR) D035701400011 COMMENT D.Steyn (2019-07-10): Directly measured physical D035701400012 yield for a CeO2 target. D035701400013 HISTORY (20190820A) SD: SF1=Ce-142 -> Ce-OXI; SF3=N -> X; D035701400014 SF8=DT -> PHY in REACTION code. COMMENT added. D035701400015 On. DECAY-DATA: -G added. D035701400016 ENDBIB 14 0 D035701400017 NOCOMMON 0 0 D035701400018 DATA 3 3 D035701400019 EN DATA ERR-T D035701400020 MEV MCI/MUAHR MCI/MUAHR D035701400021 20. 0.701 0.032 D035701400022 26. 0.985 0.040 D035701400023 32. 1.15 0.045 D035701400024 ENDDATA 5 0 D035701400025 ENDSUBENT 24 0 D035701499999 ENDENTRY 14 0 D035799999999